Difference between revisions of "The iPhone Wiki:Community portal"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Boot-args cleanup suggestion)
(AirPower B431AP)
 
(521 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk Archive|2010|2011|2012}}
 
__NOTOC__
 
 
{{see also|Unsolved problems}}
 
{{see also|Unsolved problems}}
  +
{{Talk Archive}}
== More Esser Info ==
 
i0nic's slides from his CanSecWest [http://antid0te.com/CSW2012_StefanEsser_iOS5_An_Exploitation_Nightmare_FINAL.pdf presentation have been released]. Where should we link to them from? --[[User:Beej|beej]] 17:38, 17 March 2012 (MDT)
 
   
== iPhone-Elite ==
+
==iPhone-Elite==
 
I think we should include all this old stuff before it gets lost: [http://code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/ code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/]. I mean the wiki articles there. Most infos should be already here, but I'm sure a lot of things are missing too.
 
I think we should include all this old stuff before it gets lost: [http://code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/ code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/]. I mean the wiki articles there. Most infos should be already here, but I'm sure a lot of things are missing too.
 
--[[User:Http|http]] 15:02, 26 June 2012 (MDT)
 
--[[User:Http|http]] 15:02, 26 June 2012 (MDT)
   
  +
==Boot-args cleanup==
== Baseband Chip Pages ==
 
This has been discused before, but why do we use the marketing name for the earliest three baseband chip pages? Because we list the processors under their internal name (not marketing) and the device pages are their internal, not marketing ([[n82ap]] instead of "iPhone 3G"; [[n72ap]] instead of "iPod touch 3G" or "iPod touch (third generation)"). We even have the key pages by code name and build number, not version! Those three pages are the only ones that are listed under their marketing name, not internal. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 10:24, 25 October 2012 (MDT)
 
 
== Title icon ==
 
[[File:I5.png|thumb|right|150px|adaminsull proposal]]
 
The top left icon is showing an iPhone 4S. I have made one similar for the iPhone 5. Please consider using it. [[:File:I5.png|I5.png]] --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 16:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:The image has some artifacts around it. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 00:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:: What do you mean? --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 01:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::: Clean up the image --[[User:Haifisch|Haifisch]] ([[User talk:Haifisch|talk]]) 20:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::: I added it over on the right. Look on the left side of the phone. It looks slightly blocky. The cob isn't complete. I'll see if i can fix up the iPhone one. Maybe we could get iSurenix to fix it up? I like the blue text, but I don't know if it will fit with the highly gray/black stuff. I guess it could make it look like a link, but IDK. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:::: Give me a while and I will try to fix it closer. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 20:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::::: Check [[:File:I5.png|i5.png]] now. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 21:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::::: Also I did [[:File:I5image.png|i5image.png]]. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 21:25, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== Theme ==
 
Several people are compaining about the theming/style change [http://twitter.com/#!/DarkMalloc/status/174555059777052672 1] [http://twitter.com/#!/Gojohnnyboi/status/178253989232648192 2]. I wasn't involved in this change (except the new image), but I think there was no discussion about changing the default style. Can't we switch the default style back to how it was and for those that like a fancy new theme can still have the new one? -- [[User:Http|http]] 16:37, 9 March 2012 (MST)
 
:The way to add new themes would be to have access to the server. Thats why we did this. What we can do is get geohot to copy Vector.php, Vector.deps.php, and Vector/ to iPhone.php, iPhone.deps.php, and iPhone/ and modify some variables. I can do that. Then just move [[Mediawiki:Vector.css]] to [[Mediawiki:iPhone.css]]. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 17:05, 9 March 2012 (MST)
 
::Second this. In fact, seeing as it'll have the same base html/css/js as vector, geohot can copy Vector.deps.php&rarr;iPhone.deps.php, [http://pastie.org/3583443 save this to iPhone.php], put <tt>$wgDefaultSkin="iphone";</tt> in LocalSettings.php and then [http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=special:movepage&wpOldTitle=mediawiki:vector.css&wpNewTitle=mediawiki:iPhone.css&wpReason=moving+iphone+style+to+separate+skin&wpMovetalk=1 move the css] [[User:thekirbylover|<span style="color:orange">the</span>]][[User talk:thekirbylover|<span style="color:green">kirby</span>]][[Special:Contributions/thekirbylover|<span style="color:red">lover</span>]] 02:01, 13 March 2012 (MDT)
 
:As I've tweeted about since last night, I decided to give the current iOS-like theme a bit of a makeover. [http://img.ly/fa7T Here's] how it looks in Chromium. The theme also works in Firefox for Windows, except the left navigation tabs aren't shifted closer to the center. I haven't gotten around to testing it in other browsers just yet, unfortunately. Thoughts on this? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 18:32, 12 March 2012 (MDT)
 
::Looks great, though as I mentioned on twitter, the heading should be put somewhere in the title bar area so it looks more realistic. Maybe something similar to the "other network" window under Wi-Fi settings. [[User:thekirbylover|<span style="color:orange">the</span>]][[User talk:thekirbylover|<span style="color:green">kirby</span>]][[Special:Contributions/thekirbylover|<span style="color:red">lover</span>]] 02:01, 13 March 2012 (MDT)
 
:::That'd be nice, but I don't want the page heading to overlap the tabs. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 13:46, 13 March 2012 (MDT)
 
I added my modifications to the theme. It works as desired in all (desktop) browsers except IE… I'll make an attempt at improving the theme in IE 7/+. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:05, 8 April 2012 (MDT)
 
:Looking great :) I tested in IE8 and 9, doesn't look too bad, barring the unselected tabs due to the solid background; you can use the longer <tt>filter</tt>/<tt>-ms-filter</tt> syntax [http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532997(v=vs.85).aspx like so] for IE gradients [[User:thekirbylover|<span style="color:orange">the</span>]][[User talk:thekirbylover|<span style="color:green">kirby</span>]][[Special:Contributions/thekirbylover|<span style="color:red">lover</span>]] 09:06, 15 April 2012 (MDT)
 
----
 
I created more modifications that I'd like feedback on before the possibly get implemented. Both of these are meant to further help emulate the iOS look. I was thinking of giving the sidebar and header bar fixed positioning, so they stick around regardless of where you scroll. ([http://img.ly/nded Screenshot]) I also created some CSS that makes some headers (particularly those on the [[Main Page]] and [[Special:SpecialPages|Special pages]] page) look like iOS… sections? (I don't recall the correct term for it.) [http://img.ly/ndee Here's] a screenshot since I suck at describing what I'm trying to say. :P Thoughts on these changes? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 19:39, 11 September 2012 (MDT)
 
:They're section headers :) and they look great, but maybe some negative margins (like <code>margin: 0 -8px</code>) could be used to make them extend to the edge of the page area and look more iOS-y. The top bar could go well with some fixed positioning, but I don't think the sidebar should. [[User:thekirbylover|<span style="color:orange">the</span>]][[User talk:thekirbylover|<span style="color:green">kirby</span>]][[Special:Contributions/thekirbylover|<span style="color:red">lover</span>]] 19:51, 11 September 2012 (MDT)
 
::I didn't really want the sidebar to be fixed either. However, the title bar actually stretches across the complete width of the page, and scrolling down on long pages can reveal that.[http://img.ly/nk8O] Currently, that section of the title bar is hidden by applying the linen background to the logo, hence why I currently have the sidebar fixed. Any ideas on how deal with the title bar? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 13:04, 14 September 2012 (MDT)
 
:::One small issue I noticed with making the title bar fixed is that, when you click on an anchor link, the title bar will cover up the header for the section you're looking at (and some content as well). You can always scroll a little up to see what was being blocked though. To combat this problem, I entertained the idea of making just the area where page content is displayed the part that scrolls.[http://img.ly/nqrY] I don't think that a lot of people (especially those with small screens) would like this change, so I'm expecting heavy criticism. I plan on using the previously-mentioned method for the fixed title bar instead of this newer method, unless everybody actually prefers the newer method. :P (Note that the scrolling area is not for the whole page, just the content area.) --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 20:13, 16 September 2012 (MDT)
 
----
 
I'm interested in changing the banner alert for when someone edits your talk page (or a page you're watching?). [http://cl.ly/image/3T1U3b2m0i09 Here's] how it currently looks, and <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">[http://cl.ly/image/1G1p3w3Az0D1R here's]</span>[http://cl.ly/image/1G1p3w3A0D1R here's] my proposal. The newer styling is based on iOS once again (the notification banners) and seems more pleasing to the eye, but I'm not sure if it catches the user's attention as well as the older version. (I think it does, but I'm biased. :P) Thoughts? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">talk</span>]]) 20:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:Ummmm... Your proposal can't be found :P --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:14, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::Fixed the link. Not sure how that "z" slipped into the URL. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">talk</span>]]) 21:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:::I love it! Maybe move it up a bit and stretch across the entire screen like a notification center banner? I might be able to through together some CSS ([[Mediawiki:vector.js|vector.js]]) for a fold down like the iOS banners. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 
 
== iPhone 5 ==
 
Since Apple uses the A1XXX model number to tell the difference between models[https://twitter.com/Draxelf/status/290331479022657536], I was thinking about changing the key page names accordingly. What does everybody else think? (This may also apply to the 3rd and 4th generation iPads, and the iPad mini.) --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">talk</span>]]) 19:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:I'm against it as it breaks the consistency --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::We should use Apple's terminology wherever possible. Where's the consistency problem? And yes, if Apple names them that way, we should rename all devices that way, not only the iPhone of course. But before starting such a project, we should be 100% sure Apple continues this usage. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 22:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:::The consistency I was refering to is how Apple references the [[iPhone 4]] variants as AT&T (GSM) and Verizon (CDMA), the [[iPad 2]] variants as <code>Wi-Fi</code>, <code>Wi-Fi+Cellular (AT&T)</code> for GSM, and <code>Wi-Fi+3G (Verizon)</code> for CDMA, but the [[iPhone 5]] is the only one I've seen where the separate models are referred to by their model number. We have kept the x##ap variation the entire lifetime of the site, so changing it would be a **MASSIVE** job to fix all the redirects. Plus, when have we followed Apple's outward marketing?
 
:::We use <code>iPad 4</code> and such while Apple uses <code>iPad (4th generation)</code> and <code>iPad with Retina Display</code>. We use <code>[[S5L8945]]</code> while Apple uses <code>A5X</code>. Apple labels the <code>[[S5L8942]]</code> as [http://www.apple.com/ipad/compare/ just a plain <code>A5</code>], not <code>A5 Rev A</code> like we use here. The only reason we use that is becuause Apple referes to the [[k93aap|revised Wi-Fi iPad 2]] as a "Rev A" on the **[http://developer.apple.com Dev Center]**.
 
:::What makes the dev center a choice for naming conventions? The fact that it is a **developer** center - a place where things are supposed to get a little technical. Anyways, that's my "rant". --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 23:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::::I'm not sure why you think I was talking about replacing the p101ap, etc. pages; I was talking about the device names on key pages (e.g. "Brighton 10B141 ('''iPad 4 GSM''')"). Since there are no keys for the newer devices, it's not going to make redirects. We're only using "iPad 4" because we couldn't find a good replacement, and "Brighton 10B141 (iPad (4th generation) Wi-Fi)" would be way too long/ludicrous. (You should know this, actually; I remember you chiming in.) But what's the problem with relying a little on the iOS Developer Center for some names? Using the A1XXX model numbers actually seems like a better distinction method to me. I was actually reluctant to use "GSM" and "Global" when I coined them for this generation of cellular iOS devices, since all cellular models are capable of GSM communications. But now that there's a way that Apple decided on to differentiate between them, why not use it? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|<span style="color:#BA0000; font-weight:normal;">talk</span>]]) 03:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== AppleTV3,2 ==
 
AppleTV3,2 is a Revision A[http://www.icj.me/ios/5.2] --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:Can someone please add this to [[VFDecrypt Keys]]. I tried but cannot work out how this works. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 22:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::Add what? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 23:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::: It has been done in the meantime. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 23:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Template CITE ==
 
The [[:Template:Man]] is broken. I don't know what it should do. Could someone fix that? --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 20:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:Update: Select MonoBook skin. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 20:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:Fixed. I had finals today and I edited the page right before we started, so I couldn't edit the template for a few hours. What the template does it create a tooltip when you hover over the text. It only works on devices with mouses ATM. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 22:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Source Code as defined in the [[The iPhone Wiki:Ground rules|Ground Rules]] ==
 
The ground rules state no source code from Apple is allowed, however IDA + HexRays reversed C code is ''not'' from Apple, but determined by analizing the assembly (which is technically public), and building a document that would compile to code that does the same thing. So, is it legal to post HexRays C code here? IIRC, their EULA does ''not'' prohibit it. Now, IANAL, but it appears to be legal from my understanding of US copyright. Also, look at [[MobileDevice Library]] - it's a header file of a copyritten program determined by reverse engineering... --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 18:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:I don't know US copyright. The assembly code is not public. But I don't see a problem with reversed code, because that is more like a describing language of what the machine code does. But if it actually matches exactly the source code, which you found somewhere, I think that would be a problem. It also depends on the amount of code you have; small portions to show something would be no problem, while the entire kernel is a different issue. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 00:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 
::That makes sense. As for the kernel, OS X's versions are open sourced, so those can be included with the appropriate license notice. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 01:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 
 
== Boot-args cleanup ==
 
 
We need to clean up the boot-args pages. First the technical part: What I understand is that iBoot loads the kernel. And when loading it, it can pass some parameters to select certain behavior. So this only works with an iBoot or bootrom exploit. I understand that in earlier firmware versions there was simply an iBoot variable, but that doesn't exist or work anymore, now passing theses args requires a different or patched iBoot. There are various parameters in different kernel versions. The description for these arguments is scattered over various places:
 
We need to clean up the boot-args pages. First the technical part: What I understand is that iBoot loads the kernel. And when loading it, it can pass some parameters to select certain behavior. So this only works with an iBoot or bootrom exploit. I understand that in earlier firmware versions there was simply an iBoot variable, but that doesn't exist or work anymore, now passing theses args requires a different or patched iBoot. There are various parameters in different kernel versions. The description for these arguments is scattered over various places:
 
*[[Kernel#Boot-Args]] A section with the latest boot arguments list. This should be a short introduction and having a link "main article".
 
*[[Kernel#Boot-Args]] A section with the latest boot arguments list. This should be a short introduction and having a link "main article".
 
*[[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] separate page for boot arguments, but mainly for the iBoot variable that doesn't exist any longer
 
*[[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] separate page for boot arguments, but mainly for the iBoot variable that doesn't exist any longer
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/w/index.php?title=Boot_arguments&redirect=no Boot arguments] Redirect page
+
*[{{FULLURL:Boot arguments|redirect=no}} Boot arguments] (redirect)
 
*[[:Talk:Restore_Mode]] describing the iBoot variable problem
 
*[[:Talk:Restore_Mode]] describing the iBoot variable problem
 
*Various pages referencing boot-args, like [[Research: Re-allowing unsigned ramdisks and boot-args with the 2.* iBoot]] (here we should have a link on the second title)
 
*Various pages referencing boot-args, like [[Research: Re-allowing unsigned ramdisks and boot-args with the 2.* iBoot]] (here we should have a link on the second title)
Line 78: Line 16:
 
*This comment here.
 
*This comment here.
 
So what do we want to do about this mess? I suggest to move the current [[Kernel]] content to the redirect page [[Boot arguments]] (or to another new page, maybe [[boot-args]]). The current content of [[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] and all other content should get merged into there. Then change all references to this new page and on the [[Kernel]] page write just something short with "main article there". What do you think? --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 21:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 
So what do we want to do about this mess? I suggest to move the current [[Kernel]] content to the redirect page [[Boot arguments]] (or to another new page, maybe [[boot-args]]). The current content of [[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] and all other content should get merged into there. Then change all references to this new page and on the [[Kernel]] page write just something short with "main article there". What do you think? --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 21:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
  +
:I like [[Boot Arguments]]. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 02:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
  +
::One addition: Maybe we should use [[boot-args]] as the main page, because all links are written like that. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 07:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Easy tasks for new editors==
  +
* Finish converting the remaining error codes listed here [[MobileDevice_Library#Known_Error_Codes]] into the proper mach_return_t codes they should be displayed as. (convert the negative number listed into hex, strip any leading "FF" so it should be in the format "0xe80000" followed by two numbers) --[[User:Dirkg|Dirkg]] ([[User talk:Dirkg|talk]]) 22:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Email notifications? ==
  +
Is it possible to get emailed when a watchlist page changes? I'd love that feature. [[wikipedia:mw:Manual:Configuration settings#Email notification (Enotif) settings|This looks relevant]]. --[[User:Beej|beej]] ([[User talk:Beej|talk]]) 08:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Bite-sized editing tasks ==
  +
It seems fun to make a list of relatively easy useful edits that new editors can do who are interested in helping, maybe at [[The iPhone Wiki:Bite-sized editing tasks]] or a similar page, and link it from the homepage here. I'd include the following as a start:
  +
  +
* Look at the list at [[Special:LonelyPages]] and figure out whether some of those pages should be linked within other pages on the wiki, and then go link them.
  +
* Check the links at [[Useful Links]] and remove broken/outdated sites and add relevant new sites (but don't spam your own stuff).
  +
* The iOS version table at [[SHSH]] should be listed in reverse-chronological order, with newest versions first instead of oldest versions first.
  +
* If you run into a scam site, add it to the table at [[Scam Jailbreaks and Unlocks]].
  +
* If you're reading an article and some part of it is confusing to you, post a message on the "talk" page (click the "Discussion" tab at the top of the article) explaining your question or what you found confusing, so that other editors can use this as a suggestion for improving the article.
  +
  +
Ideas? Opinions? [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 09:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
== How to report problems ==
  +
I saw people concerned on Twitter about the skin! Like iAdam1n said on Twitter, saurik just got a copy of the settings, images, and database from geohot and put them into a new site with an upgraded version of MediaWiki; he's asking geohot for a copy of the skin files. In general if you see problems or have requests for new extensions or other changes, it's totally fine to post them here and I'll see them and ask saurik to check it out. If something is more immediate and doesn't need discussion (like something missing, major errors, mysterious downtime, etc.), you can PM me or saurik on IRC (his IRC server is best, irc.saurik.com). Maybe good to post here too in those cases (if the site isn't down at the time) so other people know he's been alerted. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 18:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
More about how to report more immediate problems (or problems that require some level of privacy, such as a major security issue or "Britta has gone rogue") - if you don't use IRC, emailing me is also fine (britta@saurikit.com). Emailing saurik (saurik@saurik.com) won't be seen as quickly, but if you write a meaningful subject line (like "TheiPhoneWiki is giving error 403 upon login right now" or "Britta is putting glitter sparkle GIFs all over TheiPhoneWiki"), it'll likely be seen. Moving to a new server/admin can have some adjustment bumps but they can be fixed! [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 03:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Apple internal content on the Wiki ==
  +
I want to know what people think about having internal content on the Wiki. Some of the current content definitely needs some cleaning up and general editing. Should we publish information about internal firmwares? And is it okay to upload pictures of prototypes? Feel free to ask more questions. --[[User:Srb21103|Srb21103]] ([[User talk:Srb21103|talk]]) 05:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
:Looking through [[The iPhone Wiki:Ground rules]], it says "No posting of copyrighted material. Anything that could legally get us in trouble should not be posted, ever." I'm not sure what other precedent here has been. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 10:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
== JailbreakCon mini-talks ==
  +
Hi wiki people! I'm working on gathering people to do mini-talks (5-10 minutes) for [[JailbreakCon]] in June in San Francisco, and it would be cool to have some more people speaking who contribute to the community in ways other than tweak development. Work other than development is important work too, such as documentation. If anyone who has put some effort into improving TheiPhoneWiki can attend and would like to give a mini talk about working on the wiki, let me know via [http://www.jailbreakcon.com/#contact the contact form on the site]. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 00:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
== [[File System Crypto]] ==
  +
I just added Zdziarski's blog to the wiki (with his permission). I would recommend to take this apart and make multiple sub-articles, like an article for [[BAGI]], another one for [[Dkey]], etc. and on the page [[File System Crypto]] itself, just write the overview, similar to what we have on page 16 of the Sogeti document (wasn't there a newer graphic somewhere?) with some short description. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 22:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Renaming [[Internal Firmware|Factory Firmware]]? ==
  +
It's been brought to my attention that we don't really have anywhere on the wiki to document internal builds of iOS. Considering [[Internal Firmware|Factory Firmware]] consists of what are internal builds of iOS (with different software), I'd like to propose renaming it to [[Internal Firmware]], to broaden its scope a little more. Well, either that or create a brand new page for internal builds. What does everyone think about this? --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 06:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
== New rule proposal: Internal subjects ==
  +
As we know, there are internal firmware builds that Apple uses to test their hardware. However, a wiki user reached out to me, concerned that there is incorrect information being added about these firmwares. I have no way to verify this information (and most probably don't either), so I would like to create a rule to require evidence in the form of an image or video for any substantial information about any such Apple internal subjects. This will help prevent false information being spread on the wiki.
  +
  +
<div style="background-color:#FFF; background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0.85); border:1px solid #AAA; padding:1em;">
  +
Internal software and prototypes are rare to come across, and we welcome documentation about them. However, to maintain informational integrity, we do require evidence to be supplied with any substantial information that you have. For example, if you have a list of applications in an internal firmware, there should be an image or video showing them on the device. Any added information about internal subjects that does not comply with this is subject to removal, with account suspensions possible.
  +
</div>
  +
  +
The above proposal will be edited as necessary during this discussion. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 16:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Discussion of takedown for Cassandra Fuzzer ==
  +
As you may know, the Cassandra Fuzzer, developed by [[Ih8ra1n|iH8Ra1n]] was taken down by [https://www.theiphonewiki.com/wiki/User:IAdam1n iAdam1n]. I ([[Ih8ra1n|iH8Ra1n]]) believe that Cassandra should not have been taken down for the following reasons:
  +
  +
* Information (If someone wants to help with it, for example. )
  +
  +
* Other vulnerabilities (Read on)
  +
  +
I think that I would be leaving people without some necessary information. Example, Cassandra discovers a vulnerability in MobileSafari. Now, I make a page about said vulnerability. I should probably mention Cassandra found it. Then, people wonder what it is. So, they look for a wiki page and find it was deleted. So, now they wonder what Cassandra is, and they don't know. This, I think, is a problem. Hence, why there should be a wiki page for it. {{unsigned|Ih8ra1n}}
  +
  +
:With all due respect, the [[The_iPhone_Wiki:Ground_rules#Regarding_the_creation_of_pages_for_programs|ground rules]] specifically say that one should not create a page for a program that is upcoming. Moreover, it also states that the creator of a program should not be involved in its page's creation. I don't believe that Cassandra should be added to the wiki until it gains enough of a reputation independent of this place that someone else thinks to add it. [[User:Forestcorgi|Forestcorgi]] ([[User talk:Forestcorgi|talk]]) 00:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  +
  +
::You certainly have a good point. I'll have to rewrite it anyway because I erased the phone it was on (iPhone 4) for storage. RIP. [[User:Ih8ra1n|iH8Ra1n]] 10:43 AM, 13 April 2018 (EST)
  +
  +
== Merge multiple related pages into one ==
  +
This is pretty much to merge existing pages/links on the homepage like evasi0n, pangu, and any other pages that can be merged into a single page. Like some other jailbreaks, each unique version is listed on a single page, whereas we have, for example, the Pangu jailbreaks: Pangu, Pangu8, and Pangu9 that do not. Having three different pages for one variety of jailbreak is a little repetitive going through multiple pages on a certain jailbreak rather than just having it all in one spot. This will make browsing smoother and well as modifying each page, make it more simple/cleaner. For myself, I'd remove the "installed packages" section as, at least for myself, is not so important anymore and just takes up space on the page(s). Only posting here as [[User:iAdam1n|iAdam1n]] told me so :P [[User:Kiddepants|Merculous]] 3:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
  +
:Are you talking about just the [[Main Page]] or the actual pages themselves? We certainly wouldn't remove the pages of the actual jailbreaks, these are separate entities with separate version numbers. It's bad enough with pages like [[yalu]] already, which is a mess. I would probably agree with making a [[wikipedia:WP:DP|Disambiguation page]] for things though, and then linking these on the Main Page. — '''[[User:Spydar007|<span style="color:black;">Spydar007</span>]] [[User talk:Spydar007|<span style="color:gray;">(Talk)</span>]]''' 08:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
  +
::I'm not talking about deleting the pages themselves. What I meant was to remove the links to, such as, Pangu8 and Pangu9 on [[Main Page]], but just merging the information from both pages and put them into the Pangu(7) page. We don't need 3 different links for Pangu and can just have all of it on a single page. Along with evasi0n, we can merge the information from evasi0n7 to evasi0n(6). I mean, if you'd look on the [[SemiRestore]] page, I merged information from different pages we have into one, without knowing I should've asked (kinda why I'm asking now). That's pretty much what I'm asking to consider. It'll make the page(s) look more simple and have everything that needs to be there, and save some space on the page (along with making everything look more aesthetic). [[User:Kiddepants|Merculous]] 22:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
  +
:::I'm all for creating [[wikipedia:WP:DP|Disambiguation pages]] and linking those instead. — '''[[User:Spydar007|<span style="color:black;">Spydar007</span>]] [[User talk:Spydar007|<span style="color:gray;">(Talk)</span>]]''' 20:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Separate iPad/iPad Air/iPad Pro? ==
  +
Going forward, it would ''probably'' make more sense to separate iPad Air and iPad Pro from the regular line of iPads. From the get-go, we had iPad mini separated since it was clearly a different class. We kept iPad Air and iPad Pro tied with the regular line since the regular line's future seemed ambiguous at best, especially when we've had a few years and releases between the 4th and 5th generations of iPad. Apple not only keeps separate pages for the [https://www.apple.com/ipad-9.7/ regular], [https://www.apple.com/ipad-air/ Air], and [https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/ Pro] models now, but they also [https://support.apple.com/kb/HT201471 categorize them separately]. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 04:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
:I had actually been thinking about this recently, and I'm all for it. This isn't a new thing, Apple have always kept them as four separate product lines. They were doing this [https://web.archive.org/web/20190223044324/https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201471 before the introduction of the iPad Air 3], from [https://web.archive.org/web/20151113133619/https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201471 the very start of the first iPad Pro] back in late 2015. It ''definitely'' makes sense. We should have been doing this from the start, so I'm all for it. — '''[[User:Spydar007|<span style="color:black;">Spydar007</span>]] [[User talk:Spydar007|<span style="color:gray;">(Talk)</span>]]''' 07:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
  +
--[[User:DanTheMann15|DanTheMann15]] ([[User talk:DanTheMann15|talk]]) 03:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  +
I have done some editing for the iPad Pro OTA Updates section, it looks much more complete now, it still has a ways to go before it's complete. as for the IPSW's, i'm not yet entirely sure on separating the iPad Lines, as it's still easiest to modify the IPSW links when they are in one list.
  +
  +
== Regarding Tsunami Internal ==
  +
Recently, there has been a team of people known as ''Tsunami Internal'' interested in documenting Apple internal software. While this, by itself, is good, they have shown a disregard for [[The_iPhone_Wiki:Ground rules|basic rules]] regarding self-promotion and formatting on the site. TheiPhoneWiki is '''not''' a place for promotion or advertising of services, especially considering that the trade of Apple internal information is illegal (whether paid or free). I've just spent a good hour cleaning up articles attributed to them, and here's what I've found:
  +
* They include a line of credit to themselves at the end of each article they write. MediaWiki has built-in attribution tools so collaborators can keep track of who wrote what, making this an unnecessary practice.
  +
* They have edited the '''Main page''' to include a section dedicated to internal software groups (which currently only includes them, and probably will only include them for the foreseeable future).
  +
* They have created a [[Tsunami Internal|wiki page]] for themselves with the sole purpose of self-promotion and advertising. The majority of content on this page is more suited for a User page that is owned by them.
  +
* They have duplicated and modified the original [[Template:Internal_software|Internal software template]] to create their [[Template:Tsunami|own version]], which promotes their services. I'm assuming that they have the intent to use this on pages beyond their own, which would not be acceptable.
  +
We cannot assure the proper upkeep of TheiPhoneWiki if we allow users to create and modify content that does not contribute to the collective knowledge of the site in any way. While they have contributed some information, they have not adhered to our ground rules and have instead decided to use the site as a platform to promote their services. I hope we can do something about this and make sure that TheiPhoneWiki stays objective and true to its users. --Ryan Kovatch 07:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  +
:I know I said I didn't really have an issue with it when you emailed but after reading all what you have put, I have to agree. I'm about to delete their contributions on their own tools etc because redistributing internal content would not be allowed so it cannot be allowed here. Of course their contributions that are just about normal internal tools will not be removed as they are ok but not the ones about their team. I hadn't realised they marked each page with their name either, which is something we do not want. I'm actually going to create a talk topic on their page about it because it cannot be tolerated. When you emailed I assumed it was just they made the pages for their team but having read what you have put here and looked again, I have to agree. Thanks for bringing this up. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 13:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  +
::Wonderful, thank you! I'll clarify that the person who emailed you was actually my colleague, who admittedly worded it a little stronger than I would have, lol. Your work is much appreciated! --Ryan Kovatch 05:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Beats with Apple wireless chips ==
  +
The newer models of Beats headphones contain either the Apple W1 or H1 chip, and appear to have a very similar firmware and update mechanism to the AirPods lineup. Would there be any objections to their inclusion on the wiki? --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
:Fine by me. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 14:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
  +
== macOS Big Sur ==
  +
Out of curiosity, what do people think about the possibility of including information about macOS Big Sur on this wiki? Although macOS Big Sur (and Apple Silicon Macs) bring the iOS and macOS platforms closer than ever (including the software update mechanism), there are still distinctions that keep the platforms separate. As this wiki is "The iPhone Wiki" and not "The Apple Wiki" I have been quite against the inclusion of anything not pertaining to iPhones or iOS in the past, though that line is increasingly becoming blurred. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
:I think we should add Mac info. It’s not like we only add iPhone so I believe all Apple info should be here. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 14:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Siri Remote ==
  +
With Apple's "Spring Loaded" event, Apple revealed a new Siri Remote. This new Siri Remote with the circular pad is being referred to as the "2nd generation"[https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MJFM3LL/A], despite it technically being the third iteration of the Siri Remote. We should probably rename the Siri Remote with the white circle around the Menu button to avoid confusion, as we have been referring to that as the 2nd generation. Anyone have ideas for monikers to use (e.g. "Siri Remote (Rev A)")? --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 00:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Latest Firmware templates ==
  +
With the release of the new major betas, i've run into a problem with the [[Template:Latest_beta_firmware]] page in regard to how it looks on the device lists e.g: [[List of HomePods]] for each individual model with the firmware key links.
  +
  +
with this in mind i propose that we just have the version listed without it duplicated for every model, look at Exhibit A it looks like a complete jumbled mess!
  +
  +
'''=== // BEGIN EXHIBIT A // ==='''(taken from iPad Pro (12.9-inch) (3rd generation) in the [[List of iPad Pros#iPad_Pro_.2812.9-inch.29_.283rd_generation.29|List of iPad Pros]])
  +
  +
'''Firmwares'''
  +
*Initial firmware: [[PeaceB 16B92 (iPad8,5)|12.1 (16B92)]], [[PeaceB 16B92 (iPad8,6)|12.1 (16B92)]], [[PeaceB 16B92 (iPad8,7)|12.1 (16B92)]], [[PeaceB 16B92 (iPad8,8)|12.1 (16B92)]]
  +
*Latest public firmware: {{Latest firmware|iPad8,5}}, {{Latest firmware|iPad8,6}}, {{Latest firmware|iPad8,7}}, {{Latest firmware|iPad8,8}}
  +
*Latest beta firmware: {{Latest beta firmware|iPad8,5}}, {{Latest beta firmware|iPad8,6}}, {{Latest beta firmware|iPad8,7}}, {{Latest beta firmware|iPad8,8}}
  +
  +
'''// END EXHIBIT A //'''
  +
  +
And i believe we should make it look like this but provide a ref if you want firmware keys as seen in Exhibit B below;
  +
  +
'''// BEGIN EXHIBIT B //'''
  +
  +
'''Firmwares'''<ref name="fwkeys"></ref>
  +
*Initial firmware: 12.1 (16B92)
  +
*Latest public firmware: 14.6 (18F72)
  +
*Latest beta firmware: 14.7 beta 2 (18G5033e) and 15.0 beta (19A5261w)
  +
  +
''and at the bottom of the page:''
  +
  +
<references>
  +
<ref name="fwkeys">For firmware decryption keys, see [[Firmware Keys]]</ref>
  +
</references>
  +
  +
  +
'''// END EXHIBIT B //'''
  +
  +
thoughts on this? --[[User:DanTheMann15|DanTheMann15]] ([[User talk:DanTheMann15|talk]]) 08:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Naming of the new Apple Watch SE ==
  +
The question is pretty obvious. Apple doesn't seem to call it "2nd generation" anywhere like the iPhone SE for example. There is one instance though where they call the old SE as "1st generation" under ''Compare all models'' in https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/ .
  +
  +
My opinion is that in no case we should have the devices on the same page ([[Apple Watch SE]]) as they're completely distinct, with a different chip, back glass appearance, as well as device identifiers not starting with the same number.
  +
  +
What are your thoughts? —[[User:Dimitris|<b style="color: #a530ff;">Dimitris</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dimitris|<b style="color: #ff8726;">Talk</b>]]</sup> ⌚→ 09:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:The only idea I have right now is we have [[Apple Watch SE (1st generation)]] and [[Apple Watch SE (2nd generation)]] pages but when we name it on pages, we just use "Apple Watch SE" so it'd be like <code>[[Apple Watch SE (1st generation)|Apple Watch SE]]</code>. I'm hoping that Apple realise and rename at least one of them but who knows. I'll keep my eye out for their naming and keep checking new releases for a bit in DeviceTree. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 13:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:: Got it, that makes sense. Should we make [[Apple Watch SE]] a disambiguation page instead of having it redirect to one of the two? —[[User:Dimitris|<b style="color: #a530ff;">Dimitris</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dimitris|<b style="color: #ff8726;">Talk</b>]]</sup> ⌚→ 13:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:: '''Update''': Apple Support on Twitter just called it "2nd generation" (https://twitter.com/applesupport/status/1567908890582343681) —[[User:Dimitris|<b style="color: #a530ff;">Dimitris</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dimitris|<b style="color: #ff8726;">Talk</b>]]</sup> ⌚→ 16:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:::That is interesting. I would do a disambiguation page for SE which lists both models with links. I also noticed that https://www.apple.com/uk/watchos/watchos-9 just lists one SE for both so I guess they can't even decide yet lol. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 16:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
  +
:I believe we should just call it the Apple Watch SE (2nd generation), it seems that some of the people who work at apple are just a bunch of idiots.
  +
:--[[User:DanTheMann15|DanTheMann15]] ([[User talk:DanTheMann15|talk]]) 16:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
::The thing is we try to use the official naming here so if Apple don't use it, then we'd be breaking the way we usually do it. We do need to do it for pages because obviously you can't have two pages with the same name, but I guess we'll see what Apple does in the near future. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 16:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:::There is also a line we shouldn't cross in regard to confusion, having two completely different apple watch models with the same name will no-doubt confuse people.
  +
:::so we must append (2nd generation) or the year the model came out (2022) so people will know that "ok this is a newer version".
  +
:::Wikipedia does it and we should to if it comes to it for the sake of legibility. --[[User:DanTheMann15|DanTheMann15]] ([[User talk:DanTheMann15|talk]]) 17:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
:::As long as we're linking to the page for the correct one then it should be fine because when you click it, you know which version it is (can even hover over it to see). --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
::::If when linking we put the "(1st/2nd generation)" in <nowiki><small></small></nowiki> it can be a good compromise. —[[User:Dimitris|<b style="color: #a530ff;">Dimitris</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dimitris|<b style="color: #ff8726;">Talk</b>]]</sup> ⌚→ 20:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
  +
== AirPower is B431AP? ==
  +
There is [https://www.ebay.com/itm/325342454992 this eBay listing] of a supposed AirPower prototype. The third picture mentions a "B431" at the top, so could this be its internal name or the pic isn't trustworthy enough? —[[User:Dimitris|<b style="color: #a530ff;">Dimitris</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dimitris|<b style="color: #ff8726;">Talk</b>]]</sup> ⌚→ 11:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:11, 14 September 2022


Archives
 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 •

iPhone-Elite

I think we should include all this old stuff before it gets lost: code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/. I mean the wiki articles there. Most infos should be already here, but I'm sure a lot of things are missing too. --http 15:02, 26 June 2012 (MDT)

Boot-args cleanup

We need to clean up the boot-args pages. First the technical part: What I understand is that iBoot loads the kernel. And when loading it, it can pass some parameters to select certain behavior. So this only works with an iBoot or bootrom exploit. I understand that in earlier firmware versions there was simply an iBoot variable, but that doesn't exist or work anymore, now passing theses args requires a different or patched iBoot. There are various parameters in different kernel versions. The description for these arguments is scattered over various places:

So what do we want to do about this mess? I suggest to move the current Kernel content to the redirect page Boot arguments (or to another new page, maybe boot-args). The current content of Boot-args (iBoot variable) and all other content should get merged into there. Then change all references to this new page and on the Kernel page write just something short with "main article there". What do you think? --http (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

I like Boot Arguments. --5urd (talk) 02:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
One addition: Maybe we should use boot-args as the main page, because all links are written like that. --http (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Easy tasks for new editors

  • Finish converting the remaining error codes listed here MobileDevice_Library#Known_Error_Codes into the proper mach_return_t codes they should be displayed as. (convert the negative number listed into hex, strip any leading "FF" so it should be in the format "0xe80000" followed by two numbers) --Dirkg (talk) 22:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Email notifications?

Is it possible to get emailed when a watchlist page changes? I'd love that feature. This looks relevant. --beej (talk) 08:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Bite-sized editing tasks

It seems fun to make a list of relatively easy useful edits that new editors can do who are interested in helping, maybe at The iPhone Wiki:Bite-sized editing tasks or a similar page, and link it from the homepage here. I'd include the following as a start:

  • Look at the list at Special:LonelyPages and figure out whether some of those pages should be linked within other pages on the wiki, and then go link them.
  • Check the links at Useful Links and remove broken/outdated sites and add relevant new sites (but don't spam your own stuff).
  • The iOS version table at SHSH should be listed in reverse-chronological order, with newest versions first instead of oldest versions first.
  • If you run into a scam site, add it to the table at Scam Jailbreaks and Unlocks.
  • If you're reading an article and some part of it is confusing to you, post a message on the "talk" page (click the "Discussion" tab at the top of the article) explaining your question or what you found confusing, so that other editors can use this as a suggestion for improving the article.

Ideas? Opinions? Britta (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

How to report problems

I saw people concerned on Twitter about the skin! Like iAdam1n said on Twitter, saurik just got a copy of the settings, images, and database from geohot and put them into a new site with an upgraded version of MediaWiki; he's asking geohot for a copy of the skin files. In general if you see problems or have requests for new extensions or other changes, it's totally fine to post them here and I'll see them and ask saurik to check it out. If something is more immediate and doesn't need discussion (like something missing, major errors, mysterious downtime, etc.), you can PM me or saurik on IRC (his IRC server is best, irc.saurik.com). Maybe good to post here too in those cases (if the site isn't down at the time) so other people know he's been alerted. Britta (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

More about how to report more immediate problems (or problems that require some level of privacy, such as a major security issue or "Britta has gone rogue") - if you don't use IRC, emailing me is also fine (britta@saurikit.com). Emailing saurik (saurik@saurik.com) won't be seen as quickly, but if you write a meaningful subject line (like "TheiPhoneWiki is giving error 403 upon login right now" or "Britta is putting glitter sparkle GIFs all over TheiPhoneWiki"), it'll likely be seen. Moving to a new server/admin can have some adjustment bumps but they can be fixed! Britta (talk) 03:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Apple internal content on the Wiki

I want to know what people think about having internal content on the Wiki. Some of the current content definitely needs some cleaning up and general editing. Should we publish information about internal firmwares? And is it okay to upload pictures of prototypes? Feel free to ask more questions. --Srb21103 (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Looking through The iPhone Wiki:Ground rules, it says "No posting of copyrighted material. Anything that could legally get us in trouble should not be posted, ever." I'm not sure what other precedent here has been. Britta (talk) 10:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

JailbreakCon mini-talks

Hi wiki people! I'm working on gathering people to do mini-talks (5-10 minutes) for JailbreakCon in June in San Francisco, and it would be cool to have some more people speaking who contribute to the community in ways other than tweak development. Work other than development is important work too, such as documentation. If anyone who has put some effort into improving TheiPhoneWiki can attend and would like to give a mini talk about working on the wiki, let me know via the contact form on the site. Britta (talk) 00:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File System Crypto

I just added Zdziarski's blog to the wiki (with his permission). I would recommend to take this apart and make multiple sub-articles, like an article for BAGI, another one for Dkey, etc. and on the page File System Crypto itself, just write the overview, similar to what we have on page 16 of the Sogeti document (wasn't there a newer graphic somewhere?) with some short description. --http (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Renaming Factory Firmware?

It's been brought to my attention that we don't really have anywhere on the wiki to document internal builds of iOS. Considering Factory Firmware consists of what are internal builds of iOS (with different software), I'd like to propose renaming it to Internal Firmware, to broaden its scope a little more. Well, either that or create a brand new page for internal builds. What does everyone think about this? --Dialexio (talk) 06:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

New rule proposal: Internal subjects

As we know, there are internal firmware builds that Apple uses to test their hardware. However, a wiki user reached out to me, concerned that there is incorrect information being added about these firmwares. I have no way to verify this information (and most probably don't either), so I would like to create a rule to require evidence in the form of an image or video for any substantial information about any such Apple internal subjects. This will help prevent false information being spread on the wiki.

Internal software and prototypes are rare to come across, and we welcome documentation about them. However, to maintain informational integrity, we do require evidence to be supplied with any substantial information that you have. For example, if you have a list of applications in an internal firmware, there should be an image or video showing them on the device. Any added information about internal subjects that does not comply with this is subject to removal, with account suspensions possible.

The above proposal will be edited as necessary during this discussion. --Dialexio (talk) 16:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion of takedown for Cassandra Fuzzer

As you may know, the Cassandra Fuzzer, developed by iH8Ra1n was taken down by iAdam1n. I (iH8Ra1n) believe that Cassandra should not have been taken down for the following reasons:

  • Information (If someone wants to help with it, for example. )
  • Other vulnerabilities (Read on)

I think that I would be leaving people without some necessary information. Example, Cassandra discovers a vulnerability in MobileSafari. Now, I make a page about said vulnerability. I should probably mention Cassandra found it. Then, people wonder what it is. So, they look for a wiki page and find it was deleted. So, now they wonder what Cassandra is, and they don't know. This, I think, is a problem. Hence, why there should be a wiki page for it. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ih8ra1n (talk). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.

With all due respect, the ground rules specifically say that one should not create a page for a program that is upcoming. Moreover, it also states that the creator of a program should not be involved in its page's creation. I don't believe that Cassandra should be added to the wiki until it gains enough of a reputation independent of this place that someone else thinks to add it. Forestcorgi (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
You certainly have a good point. I'll have to rewrite it anyway because I erased the phone it was on (iPhone 4) for storage. RIP. iH8Ra1n 10:43 AM, 13 April 2018 (EST)

Merge multiple related pages into one

This is pretty much to merge existing pages/links on the homepage like evasi0n, pangu, and any other pages that can be merged into a single page. Like some other jailbreaks, each unique version is listed on a single page, whereas we have, for example, the Pangu jailbreaks: Pangu, Pangu8, and Pangu9 that do not. Having three different pages for one variety of jailbreak is a little repetitive going through multiple pages on a certain jailbreak rather than just having it all in one spot. This will make browsing smoother and well as modifying each page, make it more simple/cleaner. For myself, I'd remove the "installed packages" section as, at least for myself, is not so important anymore and just takes up space on the page(s). Only posting here as iAdam1n told me so :P Merculous 3:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Are you talking about just the Main Page or the actual pages themselves? We certainly wouldn't remove the pages of the actual jailbreaks, these are separate entities with separate version numbers. It's bad enough with pages like yalu already, which is a mess. I would probably agree with making a Disambiguation page for things though, and then linking these on the Main Page. — Spydar007 (Talk) 08:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm not talking about deleting the pages themselves. What I meant was to remove the links to, such as, Pangu8 and Pangu9 on Main Page, but just merging the information from both pages and put them into the Pangu(7) page. We don't need 3 different links for Pangu and can just have all of it on a single page. Along with evasi0n, we can merge the information from evasi0n7 to evasi0n(6). I mean, if you'd look on the SemiRestore page, I merged information from different pages we have into one, without knowing I should've asked (kinda why I'm asking now). That's pretty much what I'm asking to consider. It'll make the page(s) look more simple and have everything that needs to be there, and save some space on the page (along with making everything look more aesthetic). Merculous 22:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm all for creating Disambiguation pages and linking those instead. — Spydar007 (Talk) 20:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Separate iPad/iPad Air/iPad Pro?

Going forward, it would probably make more sense to separate iPad Air and iPad Pro from the regular line of iPads. From the get-go, we had iPad mini separated since it was clearly a different class. We kept iPad Air and iPad Pro tied with the regular line since the regular line's future seemed ambiguous at best, especially when we've had a few years and releases between the 4th and 5th generations of iPad. Apple not only keeps separate pages for the regular, Air, and Pro models now, but they also categorize them separately. --Dialexio (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

I had actually been thinking about this recently, and I'm all for it. This isn't a new thing, Apple have always kept them as four separate product lines. They were doing this before the introduction of the iPad Air 3, from the very start of the first iPad Pro back in late 2015. It definitely makes sense. We should have been doing this from the start, so I'm all for it. — Spydar007 (Talk) 07:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

--DanTheMann15 (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC) I have done some editing for the iPad Pro OTA Updates section, it looks much more complete now, it still has a ways to go before it's complete. as for the IPSW's, i'm not yet entirely sure on separating the iPad Lines, as it's still easiest to modify the IPSW links when they are in one list.

Regarding Tsunami Internal

Recently, there has been a team of people known as Tsunami Internal interested in documenting Apple internal software. While this, by itself, is good, they have shown a disregard for basic rules regarding self-promotion and formatting on the site. TheiPhoneWiki is not a place for promotion or advertising of services, especially considering that the trade of Apple internal information is illegal (whether paid or free). I've just spent a good hour cleaning up articles attributed to them, and here's what I've found:

  • They include a line of credit to themselves at the end of each article they write. MediaWiki has built-in attribution tools so collaborators can keep track of who wrote what, making this an unnecessary practice.
  • They have edited the Main page to include a section dedicated to internal software groups (which currently only includes them, and probably will only include them for the foreseeable future).
  • They have created a wiki page for themselves with the sole purpose of self-promotion and advertising. The majority of content on this page is more suited for a User page that is owned by them.
  • They have duplicated and modified the original Internal software template to create their own version, which promotes their services. I'm assuming that they have the intent to use this on pages beyond their own, which would not be acceptable.

We cannot assure the proper upkeep of TheiPhoneWiki if we allow users to create and modify content that does not contribute to the collective knowledge of the site in any way. While they have contributed some information, they have not adhered to our ground rules and have instead decided to use the site as a platform to promote their services. I hope we can do something about this and make sure that TheiPhoneWiki stays objective and true to its users. --Ryan Kovatch 07:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

I know I said I didn't really have an issue with it when you emailed but after reading all what you have put, I have to agree. I'm about to delete their contributions on their own tools etc because redistributing internal content would not be allowed so it cannot be allowed here. Of course their contributions that are just about normal internal tools will not be removed as they are ok but not the ones about their team. I hadn't realised they marked each page with their name either, which is something we do not want. I'm actually going to create a talk topic on their page about it because it cannot be tolerated. When you emailed I assumed it was just they made the pages for their team but having read what you have put here and looked again, I have to agree. Thanks for bringing this up. --iAdam1n (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Wonderful, thank you! I'll clarify that the person who emailed you was actually my colleague, who admittedly worded it a little stronger than I would have, lol. Your work is much appreciated! --Ryan Kovatch 05:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Beats with Apple wireless chips

The newer models of Beats headphones contain either the Apple W1 or H1 chip, and appear to have a very similar firmware and update mechanism to the AirPods lineup. Would there be any objections to their inclusion on the wiki? --Dialexio (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Fine by me. --iAdam1n (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

macOS Big Sur

Out of curiosity, what do people think about the possibility of including information about macOS Big Sur on this wiki? Although macOS Big Sur (and Apple Silicon Macs) bring the iOS and macOS platforms closer than ever (including the software update mechanism), there are still distinctions that keep the platforms separate. As this wiki is "The iPhone Wiki" and not "The Apple Wiki" I have been quite against the inclusion of anything not pertaining to iPhones or iOS in the past, though that line is increasingly becoming blurred. --Dialexio (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I think we should add Mac info. It’s not like we only add iPhone so I believe all Apple info should be here. --iAdam1n (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Siri Remote

With Apple's "Spring Loaded" event, Apple revealed a new Siri Remote. This new Siri Remote with the circular pad is being referred to as the "2nd generation"[1], despite it technically being the third iteration of the Siri Remote. We should probably rename the Siri Remote with the white circle around the Menu button to avoid confusion, as we have been referring to that as the 2nd generation. Anyone have ideas for monikers to use (e.g. "Siri Remote (Rev A)")? --Dialexio (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Latest Firmware templates

With the release of the new major betas, i've run into a problem with the Template:Latest_beta_firmware page in regard to how it looks on the device lists e.g: List of HomePods for each individual model with the firmware key links.

with this in mind i propose that we just have the version listed without it duplicated for every model, look at Exhibit A it looks like a complete jumbled mess!

=== // BEGIN EXHIBIT A // ===(taken from iPad Pro (12.9-inch) (3rd generation) in the List of iPad Pros)

Firmwares

// END EXHIBIT A //

And i believe we should make it look like this but provide a ref if you want firmware keys as seen in Exhibit B below;

// BEGIN EXHIBIT B //

Firmwares[1]

  • Initial firmware: 12.1 (16B92)
  • Latest public firmware: 14.6 (18F72)
  • Latest beta firmware: 14.7 beta 2 (18G5033e) and 15.0 beta (19A5261w)

and at the bottom of the page:

  1. ^ For firmware decryption keys, see Firmware Keys


// END EXHIBIT B //

thoughts on this? --DanTheMann15 (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Naming of the new Apple Watch SE

The question is pretty obvious. Apple doesn't seem to call it "2nd generation" anywhere like the iPhone SE for example. There is one instance though where they call the old SE as "1st generation" under Compare all models in https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/ .

My opinion is that in no case we should have the devices on the same page (Apple Watch SE) as they're completely distinct, with a different chip, back glass appearance, as well as device identifiers not starting with the same number.

What are your thoughts? —Dimitris Talk ⌚→ 09:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The only idea I have right now is we have Apple Watch SE (1st generation) and Apple Watch SE (2nd generation) pages but when we name it on pages, we just use "Apple Watch SE" so it'd be like Apple Watch SE. I'm hoping that Apple realise and rename at least one of them but who knows. I'll keep my eye out for their naming and keep checking new releases for a bit in DeviceTree. --iAdam1n (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Got it, that makes sense. Should we make Apple Watch SE a disambiguation page instead of having it redirect to one of the two? —Dimitris Talk ⌚→ 13:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Update: Apple Support on Twitter just called it "2nd generation" (https://twitter.com/applesupport/status/1567908890582343681) —Dimitris Talk ⌚→ 16:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
That is interesting. I would do a disambiguation page for SE which lists both models with links. I also noticed that https://www.apple.com/uk/watchos/watchos-9 just lists one SE for both so I guess they can't even decide yet lol. --iAdam1n (talk) 16:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
I believe we should just call it the Apple Watch SE (2nd generation), it seems that some of the people who work at apple are just a bunch of idiots.
--DanTheMann15 (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The thing is we try to use the official naming here so if Apple don't use it, then we'd be breaking the way we usually do it. We do need to do it for pages because obviously you can't have two pages with the same name, but I guess we'll see what Apple does in the near future. --iAdam1n (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
There is also a line we shouldn't cross in regard to confusion, having two completely different apple watch models with the same name will no-doubt confuse people.
so we must append (2nd generation) or the year the model came out (2022) so people will know that "ok this is a newer version".
Wikipedia does it and we should to if it comes to it for the sake of legibility. --DanTheMann15 (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
As long as we're linking to the page for the correct one then it should be fine because when you click it, you know which version it is (can even hover over it to see). --iAdam1n (talk) 18:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
If when linking we put the "(1st/2nd generation)" in <small></small> it can be a good compromise. —Dimitris Talk ⌚→ 20:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

AirPower is B431AP?

There is this eBay listing of a supposed AirPower prototype. The third picture mentions a "B431" at the top, so could this be its internal name or the pic isn't trustworthy enough? —Dimitris Talk ⌚→ 11:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)