Difference between revisions of "Talk:/dev"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(progress: Do we need images of the FS? Work on your grammer, and 3GS is the correct way Liam)
m (Progress)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Devices that the Nodes were gathered from ==
==Importance==
 
Is this page really that important? I think this should be merged into something else (sans the folder structure). [[User:LiNK|LiNK]] 22:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
:This page is more useful for app developer's ( e.g ultrasnow need's [[/dev/tty.debug]] to work ) and it these node's change per type of device --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 23:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
==Devices that the Nodes were gathered from==
 
 
Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 
Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Let's try with [http://pastebin.com/pn2guvRi]--[[User:Ryccardo|Ryccardo]] 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Let's try with [http://pastebin.com/pn2guvRi]--[[User:Ryccardo|Ryccardo]] 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--[[User:Ryccardo|Ryccardo]] 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--[[User:Ryccardo|Ryccardo]] 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
::Can someone please change <nowiki>{{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}}</nowiki> ? --[[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
+
::Can someone please change <nowiki>{{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}}</nowiki> ? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
==Table==
 
{| border="1"
 
|-
 
| width="500"| I was thinking that after every like 40 nodes, we add another one of these things to keep things organized. --[[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] 22:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
| width="500"| <nowiki>|-</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! Node</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! Description</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[m68ap|iPhone]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n82ap|iPhone3G]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n88ap|iPhone 3GS]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n90ap|iPhone 4]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n45ap|iPod touch]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n72ap|iPod touch 2G]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[n81ap|iPod touch 4G]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[k48ap|iPad 1G]]</nowiki><br />
 
<nowiki>! width="80"| [[k66ap|Apple TV 2G]]</nowiki>
 
|}
 
   
 
== Split the table? ==
 
== Split the table? ==
 
 
It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
   
== progress ==
+
== Progress ==
 
can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
{| class="sortable" style="table-layout: fixed; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1"
 
{| class="sortable" style="table-layout: fixed; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1"
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Devices
 
! Devices
! [[m68ap|iPhone]]
+
! [[M68AP|iPhone]]
! [[n82ap|iPhone3G]]
+
! [[N82AP|iPhone3G]]
! [[n88ap|iPhone 3GS]]
+
! [[N88AP|iPhone 3GS]]
! [[n90ap|iPhone 4]]
+
! [[N90AP|iPhone 4]]
! [[n45ap|iPod touch]]
+
! [[N45AP|iPod touch]]
! [[n72ap|iPod touch 2G]]
+
! [[N72AP|iPod touch 2G]]
! [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]]
+
! [[N18AP|iPod touch 3G]]
! [[n81ap|iPod touch 4G]]
+
! [[N81AP|iPod touch 4G]]
! [[k48ap|iPad 1G]]
+
! [[K48AP|iPad 1G]]
! [[k66ap|Apple TV 2G]]
+
! [[K66AP|Apple TV 2G]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Data From
 
! Data From
Line 64: Line 36:
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
|-
+
|}
  +
  +
== What Now? ==
  +
What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)
  +
:One other suggestion I have is to split it up by [[iDevice]] (separate tables for [[Apple TV]], [[iPad]], [[iPhone]], and [[iPod touch]]). Unless someone suggests something else, I'm gonna go ahead and make the change. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 15:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:37, 29 March 2017

Devices that the Nodes were gathered from

Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --liamchat 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Let's try with [1]--Ryccardo 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--Ryccardo 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Can someone please change {{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}} ? --5urd 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Split the table?

It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --Dialexio 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --liamchat 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Progress

can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --liamchat 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Devices iPhone iPhone3G iPhone 3GS iPhone 4 iPod touch iPod touch 2G iPod touch 3G iPod touch 4G iPad 1G Apple TV 2G
Data From No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No

What Now?

What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --5urd 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)

One other suggestion I have is to split it up by iDevice (separate tables for Apple TV, iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch). Unless someone suggests something else, I'm gonna go ahead and make the change. --5urd (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)