Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liamchat"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Template for keys)
(conclusion to ban request)
Line 92: Line 92:
 
i check every key i post and use the kbag's as evidence to prove it works --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 
i check every key i post and use the kbag's as evidence to prove it works --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:Where? I personally have tested almost all VFDecrypt keys he has posted and they are correct --[[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] 00:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:Where? I personally have tested almost all VFDecrypt keys he has posted and they are correct --[[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] 00:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
===Conclusions===
  +
I can see a lot of haters and some problems. I don't think we should ban him for what he has done. What seems to be proven for me is that he wants to make himself important. He is clearly no hacker and hasn't contributed any real value in this wiki. But this applies to many others also (maybe also to me?)
  +
  +
I think this should be a warning to him: Please be very careful with all your next edits, especially page additions. Better ask on the talk page if others agree with you before you edit. For keys pages use the standard template and avoid multiple edits. Also, please watch what you do outside of this wiki (tools, IRC, etc). I won't judge you for that, but others do.
  +
  +
For the haters: Please tell him friendly what he does wrong. And/or tell me and I'll tell it to him. I could forbid him to change any keys pages for example or to make more than one edit per day or whatever. Depending on how big the problem is. And it is clear that if he doesn't obey any given rules what I can do.
  +
  +
Let's forgive him all his mistakes of the past and treat him as a new user for now. And remember to tell me if it doesn't work. So I'll close this discussion for now and I will treat this case as solved, expecting adult, friendly behavior from all sides.
  +
  +
We can delete and/or archive this discussion in a while. --[[User:Http|http]] 00:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
   
 
== Edit Wars ==
 
== Edit Wars ==

Revision as of 00:40, 20 November 2010

Archives
 • 2010 • 2011 •

KBAGs

Hello, Liamchat! I noticed that you've been adding KBAGs to the key pages. I certainly appreciate the addition of such information, but just listing KBAGs without mentioning which file they're for isn't exactly helpful. Would you mind mentioning which file each KBAG is for? --Dialexio 21:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

i added them because i don't have those devices and i think it may help people get the key's if i add them however the exact is
  • 018-7074-092.dmg:
  • 018-7082-092.dmg:
  • DeviceTree.n90ap.img3:
  • LLB.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
  • applelogo-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterycharging0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterycharging1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batteryfull-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterylow0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterylow1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • glyphcharging-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • glyphplugin-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • iBEC.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
  • iBSS.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
  • iBoot.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
  • kernelcache.release.n81:
  • recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:

--liamchat 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Ban liamchat request

There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki. I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --http 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

??? Why would you ban him? I havn't seen anything wrong he has done... Please give more info... --Balloonhead66 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand it ether but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --liamchat 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --http 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Please give evidence of deleting / filling in wrong data. Single mistakes can happen. And his problems on IRC are unrelated to this wiki. --http 21:55, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Table

Please fill out this table with info... use {{yes|Pro}} for a pro, {{no|Con}} for a con, or {{partial|Somewhat}} for a ehh... in the first column

Pro/Con What it is Evidence Adder
Pro He helps out this wiki alot Special:Contributions/Liamchat Balloonhead66
Pro He helps overall, but could take a little break every so often and learn more about orginizing. Many pages JacobVengeance
Somewhat He needs to work on formatting /dev Balloonhead66
Pro He tested software to help developers Talk:PwnPie liamchat
Pro He finished the transcript of the 25C3 presentation Hacking the iPhone 25C3 presentation Hacking the iPhone liamchat
Pro He added iv/keys that where old and ignored Timberline 5G77a (iPod touch 2G) liamchat
Pro He help's people when they ask on the wiki Talk:AES Keys liamchat
Con He has stolen keys from users like GreySyntax and often posts useless/incorrect keys. He also deletes proper info and cites the Wiki for everything. Finally, his KBAGS aren't needed. [Citation Needed] vexenon
Con For several times he has posted wrong keys in the wiki. Deletes correct info replacing it with he's own. (Apart from being a major spammer and general annoyance at IRC) [Citation Needed] Z00L

stolen keys

can you give evidence of which keys are the stolen keys because i use PwnPie to grab my keys and only greysyntax can say i stole his keys --liamchat 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

useless/incorrect keys

i check every key i post and use the kbag's as evidence to prove it works --liamchat 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Where? I personally have tested almost all VFDecrypt keys he has posted and they are correct --Balloonhead66 00:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Conclusions

I can see a lot of haters and some problems. I don't think we should ban him for what he has done. What seems to be proven for me is that he wants to make himself important. He is clearly no hacker and hasn't contributed any real value in this wiki. But this applies to many others also (maybe also to me?)

I think this should be a warning to him: Please be very careful with all your next edits, especially page additions. Better ask on the talk page if others agree with you before you edit. For keys pages use the standard template and avoid multiple edits. Also, please watch what you do outside of this wiki (tools, IRC, etc). I won't judge you for that, but others do.

For the haters: Please tell him friendly what he does wrong. And/or tell me and I'll tell it to him. I could forbid him to change any keys pages for example or to make more than one edit per day or whatever. Depending on how big the problem is. And it is clear that if he doesn't obey any given rules what I can do.

Let's forgive him all his mistakes of the past and treat him as a new user for now. And remember to tell me if it doesn't work. So I'll close this discussion for now and I will treat this case as solved, expecting adult, friendly behavior from all sides.

We can delete and/or archive this discussion in a while. --http 00:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit Wars

  • Opinion - "a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty." [1]

One doesn't need evidence to state an opinion. For example, I can safely go around saying, "Cookies taste good," without proof and no one will bash me for it. THEREFORE, the entries in the above table should NOT be edited by anyone other than their author, as that is their opinion. You can't make me think that red isn't a good color anymore than I can make you enjoy using hairspray.

My point is, it's someone's opinion and you can't change it.

Therefore, </edit-war> --dra1nerdrake 00:45, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I like your thinking. I agree 100%
P.S: I object your "Cookies taste good" since I'm always right ;P
--Ifish 00:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. ~drake
also can we remove the mentioning of greysyntax he never said i stole his keys --liamchat 15:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Template for keys

Hi liamchat! It's nice if you post new keys pages. But could you use the standard format (template), I mean like JasperVail 8C134 (iPhone_3GS), instead of this new page from you? Preferrably without the KBAGs (until all agreed that we want them). This way you save us some reformatting work and you'll have less haters. Thanks! --http 23:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

ok when I grab the keys it reads the restore.plist and places them in the order that apple use however I do think i can change that also I will remove the kbag field --liamchat 00:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)