Difference between revisions of "User talk:5urd"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(my thoughts on stubbing)
 
(Models)
 
(122 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{Talk Archive}}
==Stub==
 
Hi Cole. I don't like having the stub mark everywhere. Well, it's done now, so we'll leave it. Better you ask next time before making such big changes. The problem I see is that many pages will never get updated, for example the old baseband version pages. Adding this stub mark will add no value to the page, nor help in getting the page extended. This might be good for Wikipedia, but not here. On other pages (like the [[AT+XNONCE]]) I don't see what should be missing there. If you know what is missing, please add it. --[[User:Http|http]] 17:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 
   
  +
== Pangu-v1.1.0-interface image ==
==Pictures==
 
  +
Why did you reupload my image [[:File:Pangu-v1.1.0-interface.png|Pangu-v1.1.0-interface.png]] and then delete my version? — '''[[User:Spydar007|<span style="color:black;">Spydar007</span>]] [[User talk:Spydar007|<span style="color:gray;">(Talk)</span>]]''' 05:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
And for the new pictures for the stub pages, you probably just copied them from somewhere on the Internet. Please draw your own images instead of stealing it from somewhere. I'll delete them otherwise. We cannot have the official Apple logo just as a mark for general Apple issues. We might be able to use official product photos or the Apple logo on a page describing Apple, but nothing else. Treat images the same way as software. The jailbreak image probably comes from a scammers page, but it's still not yours, even if they do bad things. [[User:geohot|Geohot]] has enough trouble right now, so don't add copyrighted material to this wiki. I'll delete the images tomorrow if you haven't replaced them by then. Thanks. --[[User:Http|http]] 17:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 
  +
:Yours wasn't an exact crop of the window. Did you screenshot the entire screen and crop manually? Because I just used a window snapper. IIRC, your screenshot was one pixel too tall and one to thin. There was an extra row of black pixels at the bottom and the right one-pixel border was cut off. It wasn't a reupload. If you still have your original that you uploaded, I invite you to compare for yourself. It was a minor change, so I can see how you missed it. My apologies. I should have mentioned in the comment why. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  +
::It's ok. I'm not bothered. I just wondered why you deleted my version. I just cropped it. It was just a quick throw-together. I did plan on redoing it but never got around to it ;-) — '''[[User:Spydar007|<span style="color:black;">Spydar007</span>]] [[User talk:Spydar007|<span style="color:gray;">(Talk)</span>]]''' 14:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Models ==
  +
Hi, what information are you basing the right AirPod Pro (2nd Generation) being A2698 and the left one being A2699 when that goes against Apple's convention of the left being the lower number for all other models of AirPods thus far? --[[User:Siobhan|Siobhan]] ([[User talk:Siobhan|talk]]) 14:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
  +
I see from a number of online sales sources that it appears you might be correct, as people have listed A2699 as the left and A2698 as the right AirPod. How or where did you ascertain which was which? --[[User:Siobhan|Siobhan]] ([[User talk:Siobhan|talk]]) 15:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  +
  +
: I got it from the FCC documents. My edit comment explained where: section 2.1 of the test reports by Element. See: [https://fccid.io/BCG-A2698/Test-Report/Bluetooth-Test-Report-6087940.pdf A2698] and [https://fccid.io/BCG-A2699/Test-Report/Bluetooth-HDR-Test-Report-6088973.pdf A2699] (top of page 4 on both) --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 22:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:36, 30 September 2022

Archives
 • 2012 • 2013 •

Pangu-v1.1.0-interface image

Why did you reupload my image Pangu-v1.1.0-interface.png and then delete my version? — Spydar007 (Talk) 05:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Yours wasn't an exact crop of the window. Did you screenshot the entire screen and crop manually? Because I just used a window snapper. IIRC, your screenshot was one pixel too tall and one to thin. There was an extra row of black pixels at the bottom and the right one-pixel border was cut off. It wasn't a reupload. If you still have your original that you uploaded, I invite you to compare for yourself. It was a minor change, so I can see how you missed it. My apologies. I should have mentioned in the comment why. --5urd (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
It's ok. I'm not bothered. I just wondered why you deleted my version. I just cropped it. It was just a quick throw-together. I did plan on redoing it but never got around to it ;-) — Spydar007 (Talk) 14:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Models

Hi, what information are you basing the right AirPod Pro (2nd Generation) being A2698 and the left one being A2699 when that goes against Apple's convention of the left being the lower number for all other models of AirPods thus far? --Siobhan (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I see from a number of online sales sources that it appears you might be correct, as people have listed A2699 as the left and A2698 as the right AirPod. How or where did you ascertain which was which? --Siobhan (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I got it from the FCC documents. My edit comment explained where: section 2.1 of the test reports by Element. See: A2698 and A2699 (top of page 4 on both) --5urd (talk) 22:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)