Difference between revisions of "Talk:Malformed CFF Vulnerability"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:PDF CFF Font Stack Overflow moved to Talk:Malformed CFF Vulnerability: The old name implied that the PDF parser was involved.)
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:07, 12 October 2010

New name?

I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agree? If so, are there any name suggestions? I'm partial to "Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability." --Dialexio 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree as this is misleading. Or even just "Safari CFF Font Stack Overflow". --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Meefulnes (talk) 04:15, October 12, 2010 (UTC). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.

How about using 'Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability' and keep this page an a redirect? And we need to make sure it is listed all over the wiki or nobody will find it! It's quite a name :D blackthund3r 05:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I support Dialexio's name (without "Font", because that's contained in CFF). We also don't need a redirect from the old page if all links get updated. Or are there any known links to it on external pages? --http 07:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

All right. So I'll get to moving everything on over to "Malformed CFF Vulnerability." --Dialexio 19:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)