Difference between revisions of "Talk:/dev"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Importance ==
 
Is this page really that important? I think this should be merged into something else (sans the folder structure). [[User:LiNK|LiNK]] 22:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
:This page is more useful for app developer's ( e.g ultrasnow need's [[/dev/tty.debug]] to work ) and it these node's change per type of device --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 23:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
== Devices that the Nodes were gathered from ==
 
== Devices that the Nodes were gathered from ==
 
Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 
Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Line 42: Line 36:
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
 
| {{no}}
|-
+
|}
 
== Where is the iPad 2 column? ==
 
Where is the iPad 2 column? There have the iPad 1, but not iPad 2. --[[User:XiiiX|XiiiX]] 16:08, 23 December 2011 (MST)
 
   
 
== What Now? ==
 
== What Now? ==
 
What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)
 
What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)
  +
:One other suggestion I have is to split it up by [[iDevice]] (separate tables for [[Apple TV]], [[iPad]], [[iPhone]], and [[iPod touch]]). Unless someone suggests something else, I'm gonna go ahead and make the change. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 15:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 16 March 2015

Devices that the Nodes were gathered from

Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --liamchat 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Let's try with [1]--Ryccardo 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--Ryccardo 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Can someone please change {{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}} ? --5urd 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Split the table?

It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --Dialexio 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --liamchat 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Progress

can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --liamchat 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Devices iPhone iPhone3G iPhone 3GS iPhone 4 iPod touch iPod touch 2G iPod touch 3G iPod touch 4G iPad 1G Apple TV 2G
Data From No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No

What Now?

What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --5urd 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)

One other suggestion I have is to split it up by iDevice (separate tables for Apple TV, iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch). Unless someone suggests something else, I'm gonna go ahead and make the change. --5urd (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)