Difference between revisions of "Talk:Malformed CFF Vulnerability"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: ==New name?== I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agr...)
 
m (New name?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==New name?==
 
==New name?==
 
I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agree? If so, are there any name suggestions? I'm partial to "Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability." --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 
I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agree? If so, are there any name suggestions? I'm partial to "Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability." --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
I agree as this is misleading. Or even just "Safari CFF Font Stack Overflow".

Revision as of 04:15, 12 October 2010

New name?

I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agree? If so, are there any name suggestions? I'm partial to "Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability." --Dialexio 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree as this is misleading. Or even just "Safari CFF Font Stack Overflow".