|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
User talk:Whiteshinyapple
Deleting many valid infos
Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this:
- Sn0wbreeze device list, problems
- F0recast
- ECID (format string)
- Info about software DFU mode
- Info about Saurik IP - actually belongs somewhere else
- Determining bootrom by serial number
- Bootrom version for 1G
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --http 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- The valid information was deleted because it was fixed and they have been solved.Deleted some info for ECID because it had misleading sections.anyway ill follow your advice :) and kindly look at the candidates for deletion page as i think it should be looked on -- Whiteshinyapple
Posting Delete requests
Stop. Just because a keys page is not filled up doesn't meanyou should delete it. It has valuble info that some people spend hours trying to find! And stop posting Delete requests just because it is a GUI. I undid all those delete requests except for the one blank key page. Stop posting them unless it is a true this should be deleted. GUIs sent advertising, they re just posting info on a product that does something related to the iPhone. If something is related to the iPhone, then it belongs on this wiki. They only thing that doesn't belong are teams. Only post a delete request on a team if they haunt released a decent product. Thanks --Balloonhead66 15:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
To Balloonhead: adding deletion marks is ok, even if you (or all) do not agree. And please don't just undo everything. This can result in edit war that nobody wants. Please continue the discussion about the deletion of teams and GUI tools. As soon as we have agreed on how to continue, we can remove the deletion marks. Here's a part of the discussion. I think there was more, but cannot find it right now. --http 17:37, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
