|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+XNONCE"
m (Talk:At+nonce moved to Talk:AT+XNONCE: moved according to MuscleNerd's comment, also in upper case) |
(→Baseband hacking: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :) |
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Baseband hacking == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Here's an idea... couldn't we wipe the baseband device completely (no XNONCE, etc) and then have iTunes restore whatever baseband we wanted? iTunes simply flashes the chip anyhow, so wiping it wouldn't mess anything up (besides the currently active firmware, but if done in DFU, then who cares.) And yes, I realize that there would be no signature for the baseband, but then again, there'd also be no reason for baseband signature. I probably sound like an idiot, but hey, it's just an idea. |
||
| + | --[[User:Rdqronos|rdqronos]] 18:26, 20 September 2011 (MDT) |
||
Revision as of 00:26, 21 September 2011
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :)
Baseband hacking
Here's an idea... couldn't we wipe the baseband device completely (no XNONCE, etc) and then have iTunes restore whatever baseband we wanted? iTunes simply flashes the chip anyhow, so wiping it wouldn't mess anything up (besides the currently active firmware, but if done in DFU, then who cares.) And yes, I realize that there would be no signature for the baseband, but then again, there'd also be no reason for baseband signature. I probably sound like an idiot, but hey, it's just an idea. --rdqronos 18:26, 20 September 2011 (MDT)
