Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wing gundam"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Formatting issue)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
But regardless, I'll offer $500 to a successful implementor and won't even ask for source code.
 
But regardless, I'll offer $500 to a successful implementor and won't even ask for source code.
 
[[User:Iemit737|Iemit737]] 01:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 
[[User:Iemit737|Iemit737]] 01:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
Alright, so we're up to $550! -- Hmmm, probably so, but I'm open to suggestions. The thing is, this will probably never happen unless a hacker comes through and codes it (a la MobileSubstrate, Veency, Java for iPhone, Backgrounder, MobileTerminal, etc). But hey, I'm open to suggestions, and I'm pretty desperate for a FM at this point. ESPECIALLY with Apple's continued dicking around: they just released Another Nano with FM, yet nothing in sight for the iDevices.
  +
So no open source requirement is fair.

Revision as of 01:43, 2 September 2010

I hope you realize that for someone to do the reverse engineering necessary to activate the FM radio, they would likely have to spent tons upon tons of hours to do so and $50 is totally not worth it. And your offer requiring the source code makes it seems like a total screw over that nobody stupid enough would take it. Iemit737 01:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

But regardless, I'll offer $500 to a successful implementor and won't even ask for source code. Iemit737 01:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Alright, so we're up to $550! -- Hmmm, probably so, but I'm open to suggestions. The thing is, this will probably never happen unless a hacker comes through and codes it (a la MobileSubstrate, Veency, Java for iPhone, Backgrounder, MobileTerminal, etc). But hey, I'm open to suggestions, and I'm pretty desperate for a FM at this point. ESPECIALLY with Apple's continued dicking around: they just released Another Nano with FM, yet nothing in sight for the iDevices. So no open source requirement is fair.