Difference between revisions of "User talk:Whiteshinyapple"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 13184 by Whiteshinyapple (Talk) what?)
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Deleting many valid infos ==
{{Delete|Blank}}
 
  +
Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this:
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Sn0wbreeze&curid=831&diff=13173&oldid=13172&rcid=13380 Sn0wbreeze device list, problems]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=F0recast&curid=891&diff=13168&oldid=12738&rcid=13375 F0recast]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=F0recast&curid=891&diff=13168&oldid=12738&rcid=13375 ECID (format string)]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=DFU_Mode&curid=23&diff=13222&oldid=13190&rcid=13431 Info about software DFU mode]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=ECID&curid=684&diff=13228&oldid=13175&rcid=13437 Info about Saurik IP - actually belongs somewhere else]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13233&oldid=11273&rcid=13442 Determining bootrom by serial number]
  +
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13237&oldid=13236&rcid=13446 Bootrom version for 1G]
  +
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --[[User:Http|http]] 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  +
:The valid information was deleted because it was fixed and they have been solved.Deleted some info for ECID because it had misleading sections.anyway ill follow your advice :) and kindly look at the candidates for deletion page as i think it should be looked on -- [[User:Whiteshinyapple|Whiteshinyapple]]

Latest revision as of 05:39, 11 April 2016

Deleting many valid infos

Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this:

I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --http 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The valid information was deleted because it was fixed and they have been solved.Deleted some info for ECID because it had misleading sections.anyway ill follow your advice :) and kindly look at the candidates for deletion page as i think it should be looked on -- Whiteshinyapple