Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liamchat"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(the |- is like tr on tables)
(Ban liamchat request)
Line 70: Line 70:
 
|
 
|
 
| [[User:vexenon|vexenon]]
 
| [[User:vexenon|vexenon]]
  +
|-
  +
| {{No|Con}}
  +
| For several times he has posted wrong keys in the wiki. Deletes correct info replacing it with he's own. (Apart from being a major spammer and general annoyance at IRC)
  +
|
  +
| [[User:Z00L|Z00L]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
::::Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --[[User:Http|http]] 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --[[User:Http|http]] 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:24, 18 November 2010

Archives
 • 2010 • 2011 •

KBAGs

Hello, Liamchat! I noticed that you've been adding KBAGs to the key pages. I certainly appreciate the addition of such information, but just listing KBAGs without mentioning which file they're for isn't exactly helpful. Would you mind mentioning which file each KBAG is for? --Dialexio 21:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

i added them because i don't have those devices and i think it may help people get the key's if i add them however the exact is
  • 018-7074-092.dmg:
  • 018-7082-092.dmg:
  • DeviceTree.n90ap.img3:
  • LLB.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
  • applelogo-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterycharging0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterycharging1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batteryfull-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterylow0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • batterylow1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • glyphcharging-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • glyphplugin-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
  • iBEC.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
  • iBSS.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
  • iBoot.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
  • kernelcache.release.n81:
  • recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:

--liamchat 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Ban liamchat request

There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki. I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --http 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

??? Why would you ban him? I havn't seen anything wrong he has done... Please give more info... --Balloonhead66 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand it ether but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --liamchat 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Please fill out this table with info... use {{yes|Pro}} for a pro, {{no|Con}} for a con, or {{partial|Somewhat}} for a ehh... in the first column
Pro/Con What it is Evidence Adder
Pro He helps out this wiki alot Special:Contributions/Liamchat Balloonhead66
Pro He tested software to help developers Talk:PwnPie liamchat
Pro He added iv/keys that where old and ignored Timberline 5G77a (iPod touch 2G) liamchat
Pro He help's people when they ask on the wiki Talk:AES_Keys liamchat
Somewhat He needs to work on formatting /dev Balloonhead66
Con He isn't putting information we need, and just cluttering the overall wiki Special:Contributions/Liamchat ifish
Con He has stolen keys from users like GreySyntax and often posts useless/incorrect keys. He also deletes proper info and cites the Wiki for everything. Finally, his KBAGS aren't needed. vexenon
Con For several times he has posted wrong keys in the wiki. Deletes correct info replacing it with he's own. (Apart from being a major spammer and general annoyance at IRC) Z00L
Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --http 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

stolen keys

can you give evidence of which keys are the stolen keys because i use PwnPie to grab my keys --liamchat 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

useless/incorrect keys

i check every key i post and use the kbag's as evidence to prove it works --liamchat 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)