Difference between revisions of "Talk:Siri Protocol"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --~~~~")
 
(Original article deleted)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)
 
Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)
  +
:The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)
  +
  +
== Original article deleted ==
  +
  +
Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)
  +
:Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)
  +
::If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- [[User:Http|http]] 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)
  +
:::Pure guessing from my side - but as Applidium are also AppStore Devs, probably Apple threatened them with some NDA stuff and to ban their Apps. --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 17:01, 28 November 2011 (MST)

Latest revision as of 00:01, 29 November 2011

Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --M2m 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)

The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- http 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)

Original article deleted

Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- http 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)

Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --M2m 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)
If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- http 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)
Pure guessing from my side - but as Applidium are also AppStore Devs, probably Apple threatened them with some NDA stuff and to ban their Apps. --M2m 17:01, 28 November 2011 (MST)