Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baseband Bootloader"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(5.8)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
The fact that dev team could change the baseband firmware implies there '''is''' an exploit, doesn't it?
 
The fact that dev team could change the baseband firmware implies there '''is''' an exploit, doesn't it?
  +
  +
I guess that the 5.8 exploit doesn't allow unlock because of sigcheck. Is the bootloaders 5.8 or 5.9 in the ramdisks? And is it possible to downgrade from 5.9 to 5.8 (maybe running some code in the baseband thru the at+stkprof to ask to erase the bootloader). Last thing, does 5.8 allow downgrading from any baseband?
  +
dranfi 4/10/09
   
 
== drg ==
 
== drg ==

Revision as of 20:01, 10 April 2009

5.8

The fact that dev team could change the baseband firmware implies there is an exploit, doesn't it?

I guess that the 5.8 exploit doesn't allow unlock because of sigcheck. Is the bootloaders 5.8 or 5.9 in the ramdisks? And is it possible to downgrade from 5.9 to 5.8 (maybe running some code in the baseband thru the at+stkprof to ask to erase the bootloader). Last thing, does 5.8 allow downgrading from any baseband? dranfi 4/10/09

drg

There's an exploit somewhere, but it's not publicly known where.