Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+XEMN Heap Overflow"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Don't you think that public discussion of this vulnerability will allow Apple to fix it in the upcoming update and make all this discussions totaly useless? --~~~~)
 
(exploit explanation: new section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Don't you think that public discussion of this vulnerability will allow Apple to fix it in the upcoming update and make all this discussions totaly useless? --[[User:Redart|Redart]] 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 
Don't you think that public discussion of this vulnerability will allow Apple to fix it in the upcoming update and make all this discussions totaly useless? --[[User:Redart|Redart]] 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  +
:Apple will fix it because iH8sn0w disclosed it, not because we are discussing it here. --[[User:Oranav|oranav]] 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  +
:Besides, there is a big install base using the affected baseband. The faster this is converted into a soft unlock, the better. [[User:Haldo|Haldo]] 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
== exploit explanation ==
  +
  +
geohot, can you explain how the exploit works? heap chunk pointer overwrites?

Latest revision as of 10:40, 4 November 2009

Don't you think that public discussion of this vulnerability will allow Apple to fix it in the upcoming update and make all this discussions totaly useless? --Redart 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Apple will fix it because iH8sn0w disclosed it, not because we are discussing it here. --oranav 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Besides, there is a big install base using the affected baseband. The faster this is converted into a soft unlock, the better. Haldo 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

exploit explanation

geohot, can you explain how the exploit works? heap chunk pointer overwrites?