Talk:Siri Protocol - Revision history

M2m: /* Original article deleted */

2011-11-29T00:01:49Z

‎Original article deleted

Http: /* Original article deleted */ documenting is not illegal

2011-11-28T17:18:37Z

‎Original article deleted: documenting is not illegal

M2m: /* Original article deleted */

2011-11-28T11:39:39Z

‎Original article deleted

Http: /* Original article deleted */ new section

2011-11-27T21:38:37Z

‎Original article deleted: new section

Http: comment on id

2011-11-27T21:37:39Z

comment on id

M2m: Created page with "Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --~~~~"

2011-11-27T02:35:20Z

Created page with "Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --~~~~"

New page

Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 29 November 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)		:Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)
	::If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- [[User:Http\|http]] 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)		::If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- [[User:Http\|http]] 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)
		+	:::Pure guessing from my side - but as Applidium are also AppStore Devs, probably Apple threatened them with some NDA stuff and to ban their Apps. --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 17:01, 28 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 28 November 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)		Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)
−	:~~probably~~ ~~apples~~ ~~lawers~~ came around ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)	+	:Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)
		+	::If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- [[User:Http\|http]] 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 28 November 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)		Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)
		+	:probably apples lawers came around ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 27 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)		Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)
	:The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)		:The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)
		+
		+	== Original article deleted ==
		+
		+	Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 27 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)		Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)
		+	:The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- [[User:Http\|http]] 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)