Talk:IMG3 File Format - Revision history

M2m: /* iPhone4s */

2011-10-24T14:00:00Z

‎iPhone4s

M2m at 13:59, 24 October 2011

2011-10-24T13:59:21Z

Http: /* Separation Request */ new section

2011-05-29T16:09:17Z

‎Separation Request: new section

James at 00:33, 30 July 2009

2009-07-30T00:33:10Z

Iemit737 at 21:49, 29 July 2009

2009-07-29T21:49:12Z

Posixninja at 15:24, 29 July 2009

2009-07-29T15:24:31Z

Iemit737 at 09:07, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T09:07:56Z

Rusmac at 08:31, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T08:31:42Z

Rusmac at 08:30, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T08:30:32Z

Rusmac at 08:29, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T08:29:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 24 October 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:

	== iPhone4s ==		== iPhone4s ==
−	The img3 encrypted ramdisk for the iphone4s has to kbag's. Is this new or known already? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 07:59, 24 October 2011 (MDT)	+	The img3 encrypted ramdisk for the iphone4s has 2 kbag's. Is this new or known already? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 07:59, 24 October 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 24 October 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	We now have the page [[S5L File Formats]] and also [[IMG3 File Format]] with (almost) the same content. I would suggest to either join [[IMG3 File Format]] into [[S5L File Formats]] or (in my opinion better) to separate both pages into [[IMG3]] and [[IMG2]]. In any case I think it's a bad idea to have the ''struct Img3'', Tag list etc. on two pages. The content will differ from time to time. Right now one page says that [[PROD]] is for processor and the other pages says it's the production mode. Also I think the title should be Img3 (like the magic tag) and not IMG3. Opinions? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 16:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)		We now have the page [[S5L File Formats]] and also [[IMG3 File Format]] with (almost) the same content. I would suggest to either join [[IMG3 File Format]] into [[S5L File Formats]] or (in my opinion better) to separate both pages into [[IMG3]] and [[IMG2]]. In any case I think it's a bad idea to have the ''struct Img3'', Tag list etc. on two pages. The content will differ from time to time. Right now one page says that [[PROD]] is for processor and the other pages says it's the production mode. Also I think the title should be Img3 (like the magic tag) and not IMG3. Opinions? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 16:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== iPhone4s ==
		+	The img3 encrypted ramdisk for the iphone4s has to kbag's. Is this new or known already? --[[User:M2m\|M2m]] 07:59, 24 October 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 29 May 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	I believe the TYPE tag is used to verify that you're executing images in the correct manner; as in, you have to use bootx to boot the kernel, etc. --[[User:James\|James]] 00:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		I believe the TYPE tag is used to verify that you're executing images in the correct manner; as in, you have to use bootx to boot the kernel, etc. --[[User:James\|James]] 00:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Separation Request ==
		+
		+	We now have the page [[S5L File Formats]] and also [[IMG3 File Format]] with (almost) the same content. I would suggest to either join [[IMG3 File Format]] into [[S5L File Formats]] or (in my opinion better) to separate both pages into [[IMG3]] and [[IMG2]]. In any case I think it's a bad idea to have the ''struct Img3'', Tag list etc. on two pages. The content will differ from time to time. Right now one page says that [[PROD]] is for processor and the other pages says it's the production mode. Also I think the title should be Img3 (like the magic tag) and not IMG3. Opinions? -- [[User:Http\|http]] 16:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 30 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Can you tell us what the TYPE tag does? (or do you mean the type of tag) [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 21:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		Can you tell us what the TYPE tag does? (or do you mean the type of tag) [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 21:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	I believe the TYPE tag is used to verify that you're executing images in the correct manner; as in, you have to use bootx to boot the kernel, etc. --[[User:James\|James]] 00:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 29 July 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	actually the code to check ECID is in ipod2g bootrom as well, but the actual sigchecking depends on where the ECID tag is placed in the img3. But interestingly they don't check the TYPE tag in either ipod2g bootrom or 3gs bootrom. --[[User:Posixninja\|posixninja]] 15:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		actually the code to check ECID is in ipod2g bootrom as well, but the actual sigchecking depends on where the ECID tag is placed in the img3. But interestingly they don't check the TYPE tag in either ipod2g bootrom or 3gs bootrom. --[[User:Posixninja\|posixninja]] 15:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Can you tell us what the TYPE tag does? (or do you mean the type of tag) [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 21:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 29 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	When you say it's sigchecked by the bootrom - you mean the DFU mode of it? Not the normal one that's vulnerable to 24kpwn? [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 09:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)		When you say it's sigchecked by the bootrom - you mean the DFU mode of it? Not the normal one that's vulnerable to 24kpwn? [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 09:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	actually the code to check ECID is in ipod2g bootrom as well, but the actual sigchecking depends on where the ECID tag is placed in the img3. But interestingly they don't check the TYPE tag in either ipod2g bootrom or 3gs bootrom. --[[User:Posixninja\|posixninja]] 15:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 27 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom. [[User:Rusmac\|rusmac]]		But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom. [[User:Rusmac\|rusmac]]
		+
		+	When you say it's sigchecked by the bootrom - you mean the DFU mode of it? Not the normal one that's vulnerable to 24kpwn? [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 09:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I don't think every iPhone/iPod touch has an ECID -- Isn't it only a 3GS thing? [[User:Iemit737|Iemit737]] 06:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
-Put your iPhone or iPod Touch in Recovery Mode and look at the USB section in the System Profiler (if you're on Mac), then click on the "Apple Mobile Device...'. In the detalis section (below the devices list) you will see a lot of IDs (also incl. the ECID).
+Put your iPhone or iPod Touch in Recovery Mode and look at the USB section in the System Profiler (if you're on Mac), then click on the "Apple Mobile Device...". In the detalis section (below the devices list) you will see a lot of IDs (also incl. the ECID).
 But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom. [[User:Rusmac|rusmac]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:30, 27 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Put your iPhone or iPod Touch in Recovery Mode and look at the USB section in the System Profiler (if you're on Mac), then click on the "Apple Mobile Device...'. In the detalis section (below the devices list) you will see a lot of IDs (also incl. the ECID).		Put your iPhone or iPod Touch in Recovery Mode and look at the USB section in the System Profiler (if you're on Mac), then click on the "Apple Mobile Device...'. In the detalis section (below the devices list) you will see a lot of IDs (also incl. the ECID).

−	But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom.	+	But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom. [[User:Rusmac\|rusmac]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 27 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think every iPhone/iPod touch has an ECID -- Isn't it only a 3GS thing? [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 06:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)		I don't think every iPhone/iPod touch has an ECID -- Isn't it only a 3GS thing? [[User:Iemit737\|Iemit737]] 06:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Put your iPhone or iPod Touch in Recovery Mode and look at the USB section in the System Profiler (if you're on Mac), then click on the "Apple Mobile Device...'. In the detalis section (below the devices list) you will see a lot of IDs (also incl. the ECID).
		+
		+	But, it's very good question! I think that in spite of the fact that ECID is present on all devices, only on 3GS it is sigchecked on the bootrom.