Talk:Disclaimer - Revision history

Http: comment about removed text

2010-05-10T21:54:28Z

comment about removed text

Josso: /* Removing part of "Apple eventually releasing dev-kit" */ new section

2010-05-10T09:46:44Z

‎Removing part of "Apple eventually releasing dev-kit": new section

Geohot at 21:25, 28 July 2008

2008-07-28T21:25:35Z

ChronicDev: New page: I have mixed feelings about the DRM thing. I believe that as long as no binary files are posted, and only methods for decrypting applications you already own should be tolerated. Reversers...

2008-07-28T19:11:27Z

New page: I have mixed feelings about the DRM thing. I believe that as long as no binary files are posted, and only methods for decrypting applications you already own should be tolerated. Reversers...

New page

I have mixed feelings about the DRM thing. I believe that as long as no binary files are posted, and only methods for decrypting applications you already own should be tolerated. Reversers are very interested in the way that some applications work. For example, Remote, the iTunes controller application made by Apple, would be very interesting to disassemble and see how they managed to do something like that within the bounds of their own SDK.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 10 May 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Shouldn't the part on "we hope that Apple will eventually release a developer kit, or a guide for embedded applications" be deleted? It's 3? years since they released it. [[User:Josso\|josso]] 09:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)		Shouldn't the part on "we hope that Apple will eventually release a developer kit, or a guide for embedded applications" be deleted? It's 3? years since they released it. [[User:Josso\|josso]] 09:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	Just removed it. Feel free to make changes yourself if you are sure they are correct. --[[User:Http\|http]] 21:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 10 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Look, when people download music, the RIAA loses...who cares. When people download movies the MPAA loses... again who cares. But if people pirate apps, the developers lose. And thats bad.		Look, when people download music, the RIAA loses...who cares. When people download movies the MPAA loses... again who cares. But if people pirate apps, the developers lose. And thats bad.
		+
		+	== Removing part of "Apple eventually releasing dev-kit" ==
		+
		+	Shouldn't the part on "we hope that Apple will eventually release a developer kit, or a guide for embedded applications" be deleted? It's 3? years since they released it. [[User:Josso\|josso]] 09:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 28 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have mixed feelings about the DRM thing. I believe that as long as no binary files are posted, and only methods for decrypting applications you already own should be tolerated. Reversers are very interested in the way that some applications work. For example, Remote, the iTunes controller application made by Apple, would be very interesting to disassemble and see how they managed to do something like that within the bounds of their own SDK.		I have mixed feelings about the DRM thing. I believe that as long as no binary files are posted, and only methods for decrypting applications you already own should be tolerated. Reversers are very interested in the way that some applications work. For example, Remote, the iTunes controller application made by Apple, would be very interesting to disassemble and see how they managed to do something like that within the bounds of their own SDK.
		+
		+	Feel free to reverse remote from a black box standpoint. And if you know how to get at the binary, that's fine. But thats one thing that shouldn't be posted here.
		+
		+	Look, when people download music, the RIAA loses...who cares. When people download movies the MPAA loses... again who cares. But if people pirate apps, the developers lose. And thats bad.