Talk:Constitution - Revision history

Http: missing signature for Dialexio

2011-04-18T22:31:32Z

missing signature for Dialexio

Rdqronos at 21:55, 18 April 2011

2011-04-18T21:55:49Z

Dialexio at 21:45, 13 May 2010

2010-05-13T21:45:06Z

Http: question about old Zibri link

2010-05-13T19:28:00Z

question about old Zibri link

Geohot at 01:56, 4 August 2008

2008-08-04T01:56:04Z

Caique2001: dramaremovalbot

2008-08-03T23:31:04Z

dramaremovalbot

ChronicDev: /* agreed */ new section

2008-08-03T23:14:54Z

‎agreed: new section

Caique2001 at 22:49, 3 August 2008

2008-08-03T22:49:41Z

Caique2001 at 22:43, 3 August 2008

2008-08-03T22:43:13Z

Geohot at 03:50, 1 August 2008

2008-08-01T03:50:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 18 April 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I'll have to agree with relocating the links, too. --[[User:Dialexio\|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		:I'll have to agree with relocating the links, too. --[[User:Dialexio\|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

−	Just wondering, why exactly is geohot's blog hidden/blocked? I read the reason once somewhere, but I've forgotten...	+	Just wondering, why exactly is geohot's blog hidden/blocked? I read the reason once somewhere, but I've forgotten... {{unsigned\|Rdqronos\|22:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 18 April 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:I'll have to agree with relocating the links, too. --[[User:Dialexio\|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		:I'll have to agree with relocating the links, too. --[[User:Dialexio\|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	Just wondering, why exactly is geohot's blog hidden/blocked? I read the reason once somewhere, but I've forgotten...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 13 May 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Also all these external links should be restructured into an external link list (maybe even a new page). --[[User:Http\|http]] 19:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		Also all these external links should be restructured into an external link list (maybe even a new page). --[[User:Http\|http]] 19:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I switched it since there were members from the Elite Dev Team in the "iphoneelite" page, compared to only Zibri and unknown names in the "iphone-elite" page. I don't believe there should be an article explaining the Zibri drama here, since it ''will'' wind up with a biased view.
		+
		+	:I'll have to agree with relocating the links, too. --[[User:Dialexio\|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 21:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 13 May 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm happy with the drama free version. ~geohot		I'm happy with the drama free version. ~geohot
		+
		+	[[User:Dialexio]] "Removed Zibri-hijacked link". Thanks for updating. But shouldn't the previous link also be included? There are at least some infos or tools that could potentionally be useful. I don't know anything about the Zibri-discussion. Maybe you want to write a '''neutral''' article about that dispute?
		+
		+	Also all these external links should be restructured into an external link list (maybe even a new page). --[[User:Http\|http]] 19:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 4 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Any inconsistency in the constitution? Discuss it here.		Any inconsistency in the constitution? Discuss it here.
		+
		+	I'm happy with the drama free version. ~geohot

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 3 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~There~~ ~~are inaccuracies~~ in the constitution. ~~I.e.~~ ~~"manifesto"~~.	+	Any inconsistency in the constitution? Discuss it here.
−
−	Why is the constitution treated specially?
−
−	I don't think you mean harm, but you are very uninformed for 2 or 3 of the items there.
−
−	Fix it as you see fit, I removed the protect. I realized that this isn't the place for my ideas, and if you are willing to contribute, every page will be editable.
−
−	anysim isn't an exploit, just a patcher.
−
−	anySim3rc3 was the first version to require the use of the bleichenbacher exploit. That's more than just a patch.
−
−
−	== selective membership? whaaaaaa? ==
−
−	as far as I know, there are only devteam members that are wiki editors on iphone-deb.org. that is not exactly "selective membership" by the way that it isput anyway...
−
−	geohot, I think that protecting this page would be a good idea, because it seems that confused people that mean no harm are editting out things as well as adding false facts. why not just have people flow. their ideas via this page and you can add them to the main page. this is just to weed out the uninformed information. although mn said that it's not a wiki if this page is protected, think about the.locked pages on wikipefia, or even just thinking about the state of iphone-dev.org should suffice :)
−
−	==spam==
−	I think spam has been pretty well handled. Few bots go to all the trouble of creating an account and confirming it. And I have some "secret" anti-spam stuff which seems to be working. So dev, so much for that excuse. ~geohot
−
−	And yet if you look at the final weeks of fiveforty, it was completely overrun by spam, even with account registration requirements. If you want to go off all day and tweak your "secret" anti-spam stuff, go right ahead. We chose to direct our efforts elsewhere.
−
−	I've already taken care of spam for you. Just post here.
−
−	== drama ==
−	@chronic: IMHO it is better to omit some points to progress in the right direction. Especially if said points are strongly subjective. Don't you think it is a little bit contradictory to promote neutral articles and to place higly subjective points of view on the same page? And even if you personally think it is all true, you would accomodate some people if you change the article. I would appreciate switching back to the proposed no drama version. -caique2001-
−
−	== peace, love and harmony ==
−	Please!!!
−
−	== agreed ==
−
−	yeah, I do understand what you are getting at I...othx Zf :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 3 August 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	== peace, love and harmony ==		== peace, love and harmony ==
	Please!!!		Please!!!
		+
		+	== agreed ==
		+
		+	yeah, I do understand what you are getting at I...othx Zf :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 3 August 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:
	== drama ==		== drama ==
	@chronic: IMHO it is better to omit some points to progress in the right direction. Especially if said points are strongly subjective. Don't you think it is a little bit contradictory to promote neutral articles and to place higly subjective points of view on the same page? And even if you personally think it is all true, you would accomodate some people if you change the article. I would appreciate switching back to the proposed no drama version. -caique2001-		@chronic: IMHO it is better to omit some points to progress in the right direction. Especially if said points are strongly subjective. Don't you think it is a little bit contradictory to promote neutral articles and to place higly subjective points of view on the same page? And even if you personally think it is all true, you would accomodate some people if you change the article. I would appreciate switching back to the proposed no drama version. -caique2001-
		+
		+	== peace, love and harmony ==
		+	Please!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 3 August 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I've already taken care of spam for you. Just post here.		I've already taken care of spam for you. Just post here.
		+
		+	== drama ==
		+	@chronic: IMHO it is better to omit some points to progress in the right direction. Especially if said points are strongly subjective. Don't you think it is a little bit contradictory to promote neutral articles and to place higly subjective points of view on the same page? And even if you personally think it is all true, you would accomodate some people if you change the article. I would appreciate switching back to the proposed no drama version. -caique2001-

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 1 August 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	And yet if you look at the final weeks of fiveforty, it was completely overrun by spam, even with account registration requirements. If you want to go off all day and tweak your "secret" anti-spam stuff, go right ahead. We chose to direct our efforts elsewhere.		And yet if you look at the final weeks of fiveforty, it was completely overrun by spam, even with account registration requirements. If you want to go off all day and tweak your "secret" anti-spam stuff, go right ahead. We chose to direct our efforts elsewhere.
		+
		+	I've already taken care of spam for you. Just post here.