The iPhone Wiki - User contributions [en]

The iPhone Wiki:Community portal

2013-12-01T21:11:41Z

UnthreadedJB:

{{Talk Archive}}
{{see also|Unsolved problems}}
==iPhone-Elite==
I think we should include all this old stuff before it gets lost: [http://code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/ code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/]. I mean the wiki articles there. Most infos should be already here, but I'm sure a lot of things are missing too.
--[[User:Http|http]] 15:02, 26 June 2012 (MDT)

==Boot-args cleanup==
We need to clean up the boot-args pages. First the technical part: What I understand is that iBoot loads the kernel. And when loading it, it can pass some parameters to select certain behavior. So this only works with an iBoot or bootrom exploit. I understand that in earlier firmware versions there was simply an iBoot variable, but that doesn't exist or work anymore, now passing theses args requires a different or patched iBoot. There are various parameters in different kernel versions. The description for these arguments is scattered over various places:
*[[Kernel#Boot-Args]] A section with the latest boot arguments list. This should be a short introduction and having a link "main article".
*[[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] separate page for boot arguments, but mainly for the iBoot variable that doesn't exist any longer
*[{{FULLURL:Boot arguments|redirect=no}} Boot arguments] (redirect)
*[[:Talk:Restore_Mode]] describing the iBoot variable problem
*Various pages referencing boot-args, like [[Research: Re-allowing unsigned ramdisks and boot-args with the 2.* iBoot]] (here we should have a link on the second title)
*My earlier comment [[:Talk:Kernel#boot-args]]
*This comment here.
So what do we want to do about this mess? I suggest to move the current [[Kernel]] content to the redirect page [[Boot arguments]] (or to another new page, maybe [[boot-args]]). The current content of [[Boot-args (iBoot variable)]] and all other content should get merged into there. Then change all references to this new page and on the [[Kernel]] page write just something short with "main article there". What do you think? --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 21:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
:I like [[Boot Arguments]]. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 02:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
::One addition: Maybe we should use [[boot-args]] as the main page, because all links are written like that. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 07:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

==The iPhone Wiki re-design==
The design of the iPhone wiki is now quite old and I think it should be updated. I made a [http://oi42.tinypic.com/30ib9y8.jpg concept]. --[[User:Jaggions|Jaggions]] ([[User talk:Jaggions|talk]]) 10:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
:I disagree. If anything add an iPhone 5 to the logo but everything else is ok. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 11:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
:I wouldn't change the logo to an iPhone 5, especially with iOS 7 and a new iPhone (that will probably look the same as the 5, admittedly) around the corner. I contemplated updating the CSS for iOS 7's UI but decided not to because of the UI's supposed volatility (during the beta period) and I don't have a live version to toy around with. (I personally don't like its current state, but that's not a factor in why I'm not changing it yet.) --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 16:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
::Can we not do flat? --[[User:Haifisch|Haifisch]] ([[User talk:Haifisch|talk]]) 21:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
::This is what I was thinking. When iOS 7 finally comes out, we could change the CSS to look like that instead. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
:::iOS 7 looks ugly. We do not want it like that. Maybe a bit more modern but nothing much. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 21:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
::::''You'' may not want it like that. That's your opinion. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 01:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
:::::We could make a poll, and see if most users agree or disagree. --[[User:Jaggions|Jaggions]] ([[User talk:Jaggions|talk]]) 10:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
:The idea looks nice. But before we make any changes, let's wait until iOS7 comes out. And I'd prefer to just add another skin instead (if possible). I'm still using the classic MonoBook skin by the way. You shouldn't impose design changes to everyone. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 14:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
::The problem with skins is that geohot needs to set them up... An idea I have is that we copy the Vector skin verbatim to a new skin (<code>iOS6</code>) and move the modifications (not general stuff) to [[Mediawiki:iOS6.css]]. Then we can do another verbatim copy to <code>iOS7</code> and modify [[Mediawiki:iOS7.css]]. We could then set the default skin to either <code>iOS6</code> or <code>iOS7</code> so you don't need to be logged in to see them like currently. Then if someone doesn't like them, like you, just change your settings to your preferred skin. The only way around needing geohot is if he opens up the credentials to FTP or whatever to someone. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
:::I like [[User:5urd|5urd]]'s suggestion. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 22:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
What about just removing the text-shadow element for now? I think pages would be easier to read without it. Here's an example: [[:File:Noshadow.png]]. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 00:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
:Yeah removing the shadow will make everything seem more flat but like [[User:http|http]] I'm still using the classic [http://theiphonewiki.com/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&useskin=monobook MonoBook skin] --[[User:Jaggions|Jaggions]] ([[User talk:Jaggions|talk]]) 21:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

==Hacker page==
I would like to be added to the list of hackers for my work with the Private Dev Team and the [[Chronic Dev (team)|Chronic Dev Team]] in addition to my release of the Phoenix Semi-Untethered. --[[User:Ph0enix|Ph0enix]] ([[User talk:Ph0enix|talk]]) 18:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
:Did you find any exploits? --[[User:Haifisch|Haifisch]] ([[User talk:Haifisch|talk]]) 18:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
::No. [[User:phyrrus9|phyrrus9]], a team member found the vulnerability. I am the one who exploited it. --[[User:Ph0enix|Ph0enix]] ([[User talk:Ph0enix|talk]])
:::I can back up this "claim". I was a part of it. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
::::Whatever happened to this? --[[User:Phyrrus9|phyrrus9]]

==Orphaned articles==
This is an interesting search: [[Special:LonelyPages]] - "The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The iPhone Wiki." I'm not sure where all of those articles should be linked, but figuring that out could be a useful project for somebody. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 05:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

==Easy tasks for new editors==
* Finish converting the remaining error codes listed here [[MobileDevice_Library#Known_Error_Codes]] into the proper mach_return_t codes they should be displayed as. (convert the negative number listed into hex, strip any leading "FF" so it should be in the format "0xe80000" followed by two numbers) --[[User:Dirkg|Dirkg]] ([[User talk:Dirkg|talk]]) 22:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

== A1XXX model numbers vs. "GSM"/"CDMA"/"Global"/"Cellular"/etc. ==
I know that this topic was [[The iPhone Wiki:Community portal/2013#iPhone 5|already discussed earlier this year]], but it didn't seem to come to a consensus, and the introduction of the [[iPhone 5c]] and [[iPhone 5s]] brought a lot of model numbers. Some of them may "overlap" (think models A1429 and A1442 for the [[iPhone 5]]), but there's simply too many to give names to. There are at least two that can connect to CDMA networks, and all of them can connect to GSM. In addition, with the sheer amount of models, it doesn't seem likely for one model to be treated as a "global" model. Therefore, I changed the iPhone 5c to use model numbers. I would like to do the same to some of the devices that are already present on the wiki though— the same ones from when I first brought up this idea. The GSM/CDMA names work very well for the [[iPad 2]] and [[iPhone 4]]. Things are slightly murkier for the [[iPad 3|iPad (3rd gen.)]], [[iPad 4|iPad (4th gen.)]], [[iPad mini 1G]], and [[iPhone 5]] though; all of those devices' cellular models can connect to GSM networks, so it seems like nonsense to call some of them the "GSM model." The A1XXX model numbers are also how Apple tells the difference between the different models of these devices. Have any opinions changed? Or perhaps someone new might have something to say about this? --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 06:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:I actually like the idea as it does get complicated now with the new devices coming like said and we would have to do this for all devices. Although, if we did this, we would have to move all the key pages that have keys on to support this. That would not be a big problem as we could limit the moves to say 20 per day. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 09:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:I suggest we wait a bit until we see what models of the [[iPhone 5c]] and [[iPhone 5s]] will exist. But in general, I like the idea of using only the A1nnn numbers. The only issue I see right now is that Apple differentiates between A1532 GSM and A1532 CDMA. If there are real hardware differences between these two, then we're screwed again. That's why I suggest to wait until we know these exact model types. On the disambiguation page I added the GSM/CDMA model differentiation already (as Apple does). If they turn out to be the same, we can remove it again, but I wonder why Apple lists two models (with different bands supported) there now. Someone also added the "CDMA" mark to one of the others, but that's not how Apple marks them, so I suggest to remove that mark there again. If everything can be differentiated by these A-model-numbers, then yes, we should change the old pages too. Including all key pages. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 14:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

::I do know there are 2 CDMA and 3-4 GSM for the [[iPhone 5c]] alone. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 16:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:::Ahem… ''All'' of the iPhone 5c models can do GSM communications. Hence one of the reasons why I want to ditch the "GSM"/"Global"/etc. labels in favor of A1XXX model numbers. ;P --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 16:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

::::One thing is, what about iPod touch 5 as that has two model numbers that are the same device, same with iPhone5,2. How would we get around that? I suppose we could like both separated with a forward slash. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::Yeah, we could just use something like "[[n42ap|iPhone 5 (Model A1429/A1442)]]." --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 22:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::Yeah I thought that but what about the iPhone 4 GSM and GSM Rev A? They both seem to be A1432. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 23:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::::This is why I'm against using the A1XXX model numbers instead of the current GSM/Global thing. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 23:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::::I had no plans to change the way we refer to the iPhone 4 or iPad 2 (Apple does use GSM/CDMA, and for those devices it works fine). If a new iPhone 5S revision comes along, Apple will probably refer to it as a "Rev A" thing, and so will we. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 02:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

:Referencing Adam's reply above, if we had took that to the key pages, it'd be <code>[<nowiki/>[{BuildTrain} {Build} (A1432)]]</code> which would mess ''everything'' up. What could we do? Use <code>[<nowiki/>[{BuildTrain} {Build} (A1432 Rev A)]]</code>? No. That doesn't look good. The current way of referring to everything by their supported network type (GSM/CDMA/Global) helps in going to a different page.
:Let's say I'm on [[BrightonMaps 10B329 (iPhone 4 GSM)]] and I want to go the CDMA device. What do I do? Go to the URL and replace <code>GSM</code> with <code>CDMA</code>. With the model numbers, I'd have to navigate to [[Firmware]], then find the link, or find out what the model number of the CDMA variant is and replace the model number in the URL with that. 
:Ok, who navigates by the URL and search bar? ''I do''. And I'm sure there's '''many''' people out there that prefer to navigate with the search bar if they know the page name. If we go by model number, the AJAX search results just list pages with a model number in parenthesis. '''How does that help'''? I'd either have to ''know'' the model number of the device I want, or visit ''each one'' until I find the page I need.
:Sorry for the rant, but I am '''strongly''' against this. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 23:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

::I do suppose we could just trash the buildtrain all together to shorten it down too. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 23:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

:::Dropping the Build Train would only ''increase'' the workload. Besides, what's the harm with it? We've been using the same page title structure since forever, and it's worked. "''If it ain't broke, don't fix it''". The current system works, so ''why'', other than the fact that Apple refers to them differently, should we change this? In addition, we don't refer to everything the way Apple does. The [[iPad mini 1G]] is referred to as the "iPad mini". The [[iPad 3]] is refered to as "The New iPad". The [[iPad 4]] is refered to as "iPad with Retina Display"[http://www.apple.com/ipad/compare/]. Are the key pages titled <code>BrightonMaps 10B329 (The New iPad, Wi-Fi+3G for AT&T and Verizon)</code>? No. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 00:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::But the reason we want to not use the variants is because the new devices that are coming out are breaking he structure and also CDMA versions can use GSM in the 5c plus we have like 4 for GSM alone. I only meant drop buildtrain to shorten the urls down. For the iPhone 4 GSM Rev A we would have to list it as <code>iPhone 4 A1432 Rev</code> unless another idea is thought of. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 00:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::No. Anything involving moving key pages to change their title I am ''completely'' against. As for the iPhone 5s and iPhone 5c, we ultimately have to wait. There may be different types, but if they all work with the same firmware, then what do we do then? Use <code>A1456/A1504</code>? I don't want to do that. It can get confusing in the future if that list were to be huge. With ''5'' different models for the iPhone 5c ''alone'', it's just not practical. For the fact that all support GSM, but not all support CDMA, we just do what we've ''been'' doing: "GSM" and "Global". --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 01:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::There's nothing wrong with changing the titles of pages that don't even exist though. If *all* of the models use the same firmware, just go with "iPhone 5s." If they happen to be partitioned into two different firmwares again, that will certainly complicate things, but it wouldn't be worse than nonsense like "GSM," "GSM [<nowiki />Global]," "CDMA," "CDMA [<nowiki />Global]," or "GSM [<nowiki />Global Plus TD-LTE]." If it's just one oddball, we could just have "iPhone 5s" and "iPhone 5s A1XXX" (whatever the odd one is), and include a link on the former page to say "keys for model A1XXX are on this page." --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 02:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::I probably didn't phrase that well… I wasn't thinking of how Apple markets the product, but rather more along the lines of how they refer to it in, say, the tech specs page or support documents— the pages that shows the messier side to their simple sugar coating. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 02:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::You keep misinterpreting/misrepresenting what I'm proposing. I never said anything about dropping, say, "iPhone 5" so firmware page titles would look like [[Sundance 10A405 (A1428)]]. I want to change the GSM/Global part to the A1XXX number, so it would probably show like [[Sundance 10A405 (iPhone 5 A1428)]]. (If a hardware revision were made, it would probably look like [[Sundance 10A405 (iPhone 5 A1428 Rev A)]].) From time to time, I edit URLs to browse the wiki too. But the GSM/Global identifiers don't work that well; again, '''all iPhone 5 models can connect to GSM'''. That's not really helpful. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 02:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

:::I suggest we drop the A and use Rev. As for the idea of changing to A1XXX, I see no issues and am for the idea. I admit it can cause chaos when we move the pages but we could limit the moving per day of course. Overall, I think it will be worth it. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 10:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::No. Don't drop the <code>A</code> from <code>Rev A</code>. Why would you even think to? You want to call them what Apple calls them, and the [[n90bap|revised iPhone 4 GSM]] is referred to with <code>Rev A</code>. In addition, there have been <code>Rev ''B''</code> things before, such as the [[S5L8947]] (A5 Rev B) used in the [[j33iap|revised Apple TV 3G]]. In addition, think of all the redirects we would need to keep for sites that link to key pages directly. I have even seen sites that still link with the URLs as <code>/wiki/index.php?title={Title}</code> instead of the year old change to <code>/wiki/{Title}</code>. The wiki handles that internally for us, but the redirects made in the moves would have to be kept. Currently, only the [[iPhone 5]] and [[iPad 4]] are the only devices referred to by their model numbers. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

:::That's why I don't want to change it. It's worked for us, and we have no idea how the new firmwares will be handled. I am betting that there will only be two firmware types - one for the GSM, and one for the Global (GSM+CDMA) model. The only reason they are split, IIRC, is because AT&T uses different LTE bands than rest of the GSM world.
:::Ultimately, the GSM/CDMA/Global monikors haven't caused any ''naming conflicts''. Ok, you don't want to use the ''marketing'' title. What about the way they are referred to on [[Apple Developer Center|ADC]], because that seems to be what you want. I may be misreading what you're saying again, but if we're going to do that, let's use their ''full'' title. Something <code>(iPad [4th generation Model A1458])</code> (iPad 4 Wi-Fi) and <code>(iPad Wi-Fi + Cellular [model for Verizon])</code> (iPad 3 Global). Does the first one tell you if the device is Wi-Fi or a Wi-Fi+3G model? Does the second one tell you ''at all'' that it is an [[iPad 3]], or that it supports GSM? No.
:::Apple has a history of being inconsistent. For example, the iPad 3 Wi-Fi is referred to on ADC (and iTunes) as "iPad Wi-Fi (3rd generation)" while the iPad 3 GSM is referred to as "iPad Wi-Fi + Cellular [model for AT&T]". What happened to the "3rd generation"? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::We could always list as <code>iPhone 4 (iPhone3,1)</code> etc instead if that would be better. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 21:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

::::Why is there a need to explicitly keep "Wi-Fi" in a key page's title? All you need is a way to distinguish what model it is from its other variants— the A1XXX model number does just that. It's not like we referred to the AppleTV3,2 as "Apple TV 3G (New Single-Core A5)" or something. And obviously, we can use common sense to address the 3rd generation iPad issue you brought up… Now you're just nitpicking. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 05:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
:::::Actually, I think we should wait until we see the firmware for iPhone 5c/5s and then decide. TBH, as [[User:5urd|5urd]] said, it is ok as it is but of course if once the new firmware is out it is more confusing, then we can think again. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 14:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::Come to think of it, we can use a mix of both; we can keep the "Global" moniker, but drop the "GSM" moniker in favor of the A1XXX model number. (The "GSM" moniker is the one that's been bothering me.) I think this works well for the iPad 3 (which is actually split into "CDMA" and "Global—" it probably doesn't need to be done for this), iPad 4, iPad mini 1G, and iPhone 5, but this leaves the question of what to do for the iPhone 5C/5S. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 04:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::That would look worse! If we are going to do it, we have to do it for '''''all'''''. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 09:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::::What is the status on this now? --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 21:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::This discussion has stagnated, but I'm firing it up again— I want to fix this before the end of the year, so this can probably be seen as an ultimatum. Now that Apple has pushed a 7.1 beta to developers, we now know how Apple's splitting the new iPhones up— and it's by A1XXX model numbers still. :\ That's probably the path the wiki will go down, but I do have another idea. The other idea I have in mind is using the A1XXX model number for the cellular devices launched last year. But for this year's iPhones, the FCC ID is actually different between the two, so we could actually use that. Before this gets nitpicked on, the last letter can get changed to an "X" to signify that it's a wildcard of sorts. It's not a pretty solution so I do expect it to get shot down (hence why I'm going with the A1XXX model numbers unless everyone says otherwise), but I'm still throwing it out there in case everyone actually likes that. Everyone is welcome to suggest alternatives, but I '''will''' eliminate that GSM label before the year ends. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 18:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

::::::That is worse, nobody knows the FCC ID off the top of their head. I would suggest "iPhone 5 (iPhone5,1)" if anything. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::Using "iPhone5,1" or "iPhone6,2" is even ''less'' friendly… The FCC ID can be looked up in Settings or the back of a device. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

::::::::Well that is not the point. I say either use the firmware name or leave it alone. See what others thing though. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 19:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::::I currently plan on using the A1XXX model numbers— the FCC ID proposal was just thrown out there in the off chance that someone might like it. I'm not really a fan of it myself, but the FCC ID is probably the simplest way to figure out if it's an iPhone6,1 or iPhone6,2 since both have multiple A1XXX model numbers. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 19:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

::::::I agree to get rid of the "GSM" name, as almost all iPhones support GSM. The Axxxx numbers would be nice, but as some phones have several numbers, like A1457/A1518/A1528/A1530 (what is actually different between them?) we can't use it. For the FCC-ID, we can't use that either, because for example the iPhone 5 with FCC-ID BCG-E2599A stands for the GSM/A1428 and also for the GSM+CDMA/A1429 version. So I suggest to either use the identifier (like iPhone2,1) or better the internal name (like n88ap). That would have the advantage to separate them further, because the iPhone 4 A1332 has two internal versions: iPhone3,1/n90ap and the iPhone3,2/n90bap. The bigger question is where you want to use this. That determines mainly the name. On all the key pages? Then it must be a name that is different between models that use different firmwares. And regarding key pages, maybe we should delete all the key pages from this wiki and move them into some database instead and provide a nice user interface and API around it and integrate that into the wiki somehow. That way we can change all pages with one simple edit. For the name, I prefer the internal name. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 23:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::We would have to edit key pages too. They should not be removed however. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 23:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::Well, I wasn't trying to say that we had to decide on one way to differentiate ''everything''; "GSM" does work fine for, say, the iPhone 4. The proposal I brought up today was using the FCC ID only for this year's (2013's) iPhones— last year's cellular devices would get the A1XXX model numbers (i.e. two different solutions for two different years). But as of right now, I like how using A1XXX model numbers sounds for all of the affected devices, mostly because that's the path Apple's going in their developer portal. Something like "iPhone 5s (Model A1457/A1518/A1528/A1530)" is admittedly a mouthful for this year's iPhones though. At the moment, I'm inquiring about how to label it on [[Firmware]] and such pages, but I'm sure the outcome can be adapted for key page titles as well. As for differences between the models, it seems to be the supported LTE bands. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 03:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::::I still think that unless it is "iPhone 5 (iPhone5,1)" it will be complicated but on the other hand, I kind of like the idea that [[User:Http|http]] had, using the internal identifiers like this "iPhone 5 (n42ap)". The only problem is that it would cause quite a bit of a flood moving the key pages, although this can be done like 15 per day each or something. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 09:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

::::::::::I'm pretty sure the only key page that exists for an A5 (or newer) device is [[Telluride 9A406 (iPhone 4S)]]. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 17:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

:::::::::::That was an example. I know there are no more A5 pages, only the one you said and two beta for iPhone 4S. I just meant that it would show the design. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 13:36, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

== "GSM" Replacement Proposals ==
Since this discussion has become extremely lengthy, here are the proposals (to my understanding) for changing the labels, each of which can be subject to changes (i.e. dropping the word "Model" from Proposal A). In an effort to conserve space (ironically, this still adds a significant amount of length), I only included a few models, which should give an idea of the proposal. Basically anything with an A5 or newer is involved. Feel free to edit this list if I missed or totally misinterpreted something. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 03:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
# Proposal A (A1XXX numbers)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1458)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1459)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1460)
#* iPhone 5 (Model A1428)
#* iPhone 5 (Model A1429/A1442)
#* iPhone 5c (Model A1456/A1532)
#* iPhone 5c (Model A1507/A1516/A1526/A1529)
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPad 4 A1458)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5 A1429/A1442)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5c Model A1507/A1516/A1526/A1529)]]
# Proposal B (A1XXX + FCC ID)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1458)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1459)
#* iPad 4 (Model A1460)
#* iPhone 5 (Model A1428)
#* iPhone 5 (Model A1429/A1442)
#* iPhone 5c (BCG‑E2644A)
#* iPhone 5c (BCG‑E2694X)
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPad 4 A1458)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5 A1429/A1442)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5c BCG‑E2694X)]]
# Proposal C (-AP Identifier)
#* iPad 4 (p101ap)
#* iPad 4 (p102ap)
#* iPad 4 (p103ap)
#* iPhone 5 (n41ap)
#* iPhone 5 (n42ap)
#* iPhone 5c (n48ap)
#* iPhone 5c (n49ap)
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPad 4 p101ap)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5c n42ap)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone 5c n49ap)]]
# Proposal D (iPhoneX,Y Identifier)
#* iPad 4 (iPad3,4)
#* iPad 4 (iPad3,5)
#* iPad 4 (iPad3,6)
#* iPhone 5 (iPhone5,1)
#* iPhone 5 (iPhone5,2)
#* iPhone 5c (iPhone5,3)
#* iPhone 5c (iPhone5,4)
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPad3,4)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone5,2)]]
#* [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a (iPhone5,4)]]

:I like this [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a iPad 4 (3,4)]] or [[InnsbruckTaos 11B554a iPad 4 (iPad3,4)]]. I see there are 4 ways to approach this;
1. Change every single device. 
2. Change just devices with different variants, iPad 2+, iPad mini+, iPhone 4, iPhone 5+. 
3. Change A5+ only (which I hate the idea of). 
4. Change nothing at all. 
--[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 09:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
::My intention for this was to be a ''neutral'' (i.e. opinion-free) spot where all of the proposals were being mentioned, so people could easily see the proposed changes without any bias… v.v --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 20:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
:::TBH, I think it is better as it is, but I just stated my opinion that only A5+ would make in inconsistent. Though you could argue it is already, that is down to Apple and furthermore, just A5+ would still not eliminate iPhone 4 (GSM, GSM Rev A or CDMA). --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 17:07, November 22, 2013‎ (UTC)}}
:Do it like #4, and do them all. --[[User:CompilingEntropy|CompilingEntropy]] ([[User talk:CompilingEntropy|talk]]) 18:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
::::It will be a pain, but I like [[User:CompilingEntropy|CompilingEntropy]]'s idea as it would make it much much better in the end. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 16:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

== Key page template ==
I actually like the idea of a database to an extent. I bet I could put together an extension that creates a [[Special:SpecialPages|special page]] that allows read access to everyone (and r/w access to users). Any edits to the key "pages" wouldn't cause a [[Special:RecentChanges|recent changes]] log. If we ever needed to update the layout, we would just need to update the extension. We could even have an API.
The only limitation is that updates to the extension would require either [[User:geohot|George]] or [[User:Dialexio|Alex]] needing to upload the fix. If we were to set up an external site, then all links to it would need to be wrapped with <code>...</code>.
Maybe a simple extension that takes links and redirects you to the external site? That could work. Like, we would have a link to, say, <code>[[<nowiki/>Special:Keys/iPad1,1/9A405]]</code> which would give an HTTP <code>301 Moved Permanently</code> header to, say, <code><nowiki>http://ioskeys.com/iPad1,1/9A405</nowiki></code>. Granted, someone would have to pay for the domain, but it would solve this problem. I may be able to pay for the domain if I make enough money by the time I finish writing everything. Any opposition? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 16:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
:I do not like the idea. I like the idea of the database to a degree, but I think that the pages should remain on this wiki. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 17:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
::I don't see this solving any problem— the backlash against changing the key page template was because of (unnecessary?) changes to the arguments, and the frequency of how often such changes were being proposed/applied. How would a database prevent it? For instance, let's say the database columns are all decided on. Suddenly, it's decided that SHA-1 hashes should be added as well, or perhaps "VFDecryptKey" will be renamed to "FSKey." People submitting keys would still be bothered with having to adjust for those changes. --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 17:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
:::That with the database is something I'll implement anyway (if not someone else is faster, as I'm quite busy). I just threw that in here as it might solve the problem of the frequent template updates (which is/was wrong anyway). From there it would be easy to create the VFDecrypt page with an overview link or lists of missing keys and that stuff, so the wiki would not need any direct links. But it would mean that we either completely remove all keys here from the wiki and embrace that solution or have them still duplicate (which then doesn't solve the problem). Dialexio: renaming columns can be handled without interface changes, but that's another topic. So let's forget about this database thing for now and we can discuss again when I have something. We certainly don't want to add extensions for that. So back to the discussion about the renaming: If I understood this correctly, you only want to rename A5+ devices and therefore no key pages would be affected. Is my understanding correct? --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
::::As long as the pages stay on this wiki, I do not mind. Although, a database could be pointless as with only 50 more pages to edit for the new format, there is no planned new format/changes again. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 22:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
::::About the renaming, that is correct; I'm only interested in changing the cellular labels on A5/+ devices. (Well, the iPad 2 can remain as-is.) --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 00:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::Oh, well that would just make things more complicated/inconsistent. We should do all or none. About the template idea, there is also no need as it is not likely we will change the format again. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 00:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
::::::Do we really need to CHANGE THE FORMAT 50 TIMES IN A ROW? The old one before everything was messed with worked fine enough. [[User:Winocm|Winocm]] ([[User talk:Winocm|talk]]) 18:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::::It was actually one change, which was completed. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

==Login prompt revision suggestion==
I wrote a suggestion here: [[MediaWiki talk:Loginprompt]] (since I don't have permission to edit [[MediaWiki:Loginprompt]] directly) - I'd be interested in whether it sounds like a good idea to other people. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 01:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

==Homepage suggestions==
Under "Application Development", what about linking to [http://iphonedevwiki.net/index.php/Main_Page iPhoneDevWiki]? It's also a community-edited technical resource, and it links to this wiki. It could be helpful to add a little more detail to "Get [[up to speed]] in the community.", like this: "Get [[up to speed]] in the community - learn about how jailbreaks work." Under "Definitions", it could be helpful to list all the firmware tags in one line or sub-list, similar to how Jailbreak is organized next to Tethered jailbreak and Untethered jailbreak, both to save space and help readers understand the list. --[[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 23:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
:A link to the iPhoneDevWiki sounds good. I wonder if we should have an "External Links" or "Other Resources" section to include links to other sites (such as the [http://blog.iphone-dev.org/ iPhone Dev Team blog]) though. As for the "Up to Speed" page, I feel like the entire page could be reworked a bit— and perhaps even receive a new, clearer name ([[Introduction]]? [[Preface]]? Or something else?)— the current name makes it sound like it's for people that last paid attention to jailbreaking when the App Store didn't exist. And yeah, moving the IMG3 tags to a sub-list sounds like a really good idea. (Admittedly, I actually don't care for its inclusion in the first place, but that's just a personal preference.) --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 00:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
::There's already [[Useful Links]] with some links to other core community resources (which could be updated and rearranged) - I was just thinking that it'd be especially useful to link to iPhoneDevWiki prominently since it's likely for TheiPhoneWiki visitors to also be interested in relatively-organized technical information about development. Changing the name of "Up to Speed" sounds fine to me too - that page didn't get much attention since 2008 until I sort of commandeered it to serve as an "intro to jailbreaking" page. :) It could be renamed "getting started", as in "how to get started on learning about research into iOS devices, especially security research (such as jailbreaks)". [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 00:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Also I'd love to see a dedicated section for "Good tasks for new editors", where we could maintain a list of relatively easy/straightforward suggested edits that wouldn't require vast technical knowledge, like updating that links page. Where would that go? Add it as a sub-section of [[The iPhone Wiki:Current events]] and link that section from the homepage or something? Or make a new page? [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 00:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

==What is 0x5265c384 in the boot process?==
Does anybody know where <code>0x5265c384</code> points to in the boot process? I haven't been able to find anything on it. --[[User:Ph0enix|Ph0enix]] ([[User talk:Ph0enix|talk]]) 20:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

==License for contributions==
This wiki has never had an official license for contributions. Now, IANAL, but IIRC, this means that you can't use ''anything'' posted here unless it qualifies as fair-use. What I propose is that we set a license and add a notice that states that any contributions after a set date are to be licensed under that license (that's kindof a mouthful). I think we should use the [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ CC-by-SA 3.0] as [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|Wikipedia uses it]], but that's just me. Any ideas? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 19:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
:Well, the edit info already says all this:
Please note that all contributions to The iPhone Wiki may be edited, altered, or
removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly,
then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public
domain or similar free resource (see The [[:The iPhone Wiki:Copyrights|iPhone Wiki:Copyrights]] for details). '''Do not'''
'''submit copyrighted work without permission!'''
For me, that's enough. I don't need a 50 page license. But if you want to formalize this more, go ahead. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 20:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

:Sounds good. It's good practice to have an official license, just in case any disputes happen someday, and to ensure that it's OK to copy text over to Wikipedia (for example). [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 21:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

==Future plans==
Now that I have SSH access, I've begun working on making several, somewhat-overdue changes to the wiki. The Renameuser extension was reinstated, so admins can now rename accounts. If you have another account, that can also get merged into your current account. If you happen to get locked out from both your account and the email used is no longer active, I can run a script to reset your password. I've also begun implementing a very noticeable change— as users of the Vector skin have noticed, the iOS 6-based theming is gone. It's a semi-temporary move though; it's going into its own skin, because… you know, choice is cool. People who like the Vector skin may not have liked the iOS theming, especially since IE 9 and lower didn't display it completely accurately. Therefore, it's going into its own theme. Once that's done I also plan on making a separate iOS 7-based skin. If there are any further thoughts or suggestions on how to improve the wiki, do let me know! --[[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] ([[User talk:Dialexio|talk]]) 22:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

==#we r of==
#we r hav from of #QUESTIN holme ! #we r from of #WONDER #what is of #RESON in of #EDIT #wikeee ? #tanks and of RT #RT Smiley Smiley :) :) [[User:UnthreadedJB|UnthreadedJB]] ([[User talk:UnthreadedJB|talk]]) 20:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

:#we r of #WONDER ! #is from also #of #WAKIKIKI #open src :) #is avalable under from of #FRE license ? --[[User:UnthreadedJB|UnthreadedJB]] ([[User talk:UnthreadedJB|talk]]) 21:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

User:UnthreadedJB

2013-12-01T20:08:02Z

UnthreadedJB:

<nowiki>#</nowiki>HOLMES

User talk:IAdam1n

2013-12-01T20:07:15Z

UnthreadedJB:

{{Talk Archive}}
If you have any questions/concerns about an edit I made, please use this talk page to discuss it or [[Special:Emailuser/iAdam1n|email]] me.

== Archiving ==
Please don't move discussions to the archive before they are really old. I understand that you would prefer to have a "clean" personal discussion page, but this applies to all discussions, not only this page. If someone wants to contribute after that, it requires three edits. Just leave the page a half year with that discussion there and when it's really old you can still move it. Thanks. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 21:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
:Ok, though people can just simply move it back. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 22:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

== #we r of ==
#we r hav from of #QUESTIN holme ! #we r from of #WONDER #what is of #RESON in of #EDIT #wikeee ? #tanks and of RT #RT Smiley Smiley :) :) [[User:UnthreadedJB|UnthreadedJB]] ([[User talk:UnthreadedJB|talk]]) 20:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Unthredera1n

2013-08-21T17:44:56Z

UnthreadedJB: #we r not #fakr

{{lowercase}}
'''[http://unthreadedjb.com unthredera1n]''' is an [[untethered jailbreak]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices except [[k66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1. It is currently available for Linux (x86_64) and OS X. Not much is currently known about this tool.

== unthredeh4il ==
[[unthredera1n|unthredeh4il]] is an improved version of [[unthredera1n]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices including [[K66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1 including Apple TV OS versions: 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.3 (all versions), 4.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 5.0, and 5.0.1. This is still an [[untethered jailbreak]].

== Controversy ==
On Reddit, where [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1j4u02/we_hav_releese_isounthreadedjb_redy_4_dl/cbbapvp planetbeing and saurik discussed unthredera1n], saurik said:

<blockquote>
The program is custom; it is using the Rocky Racoon packet filter kernel exploit, but the evasi0n amfid bypass. I verified this somewhat by glancing at the binary (opens /dev/pf, etc.), but they also say this explicitly in some strings inside of the binary (which might be output when it runs or something) and in a hidden readme file.
From .REAL_USAGE:
<blockquote>Thanks to @Chronic-Dev/@planetbeing/@posixninja for the original rocky-raccon pf kernel exploit. Thanks to @evad3rs for their awesome MobileBackup2 stuff. It worked really well on this.</blockquote>
From jb binary:
<blockquote>WE R NOT #FAKR, UNTHREADEDJB IS REEL tanks 2 @planetbeing n @posixninja n @chronicdev for #explot code in rkcy raccon :) :) :) krnl patchs from #opensn0w ))</blockquote>
</blockquote>

===References===
* [http://pastie.org/8255242 unthredeh4il supported firmwares/devices]
* [https://github.com/UnthreadedJB/isounthreadedjb Github source code (down now)]
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1kjddw/we_r_relees_ful_src_code_of_unthreaddra1n_clasic/cbplh58 Comments from planetbeing and Saurik]

{{stub|jailbreaking}}
[[Category:Jailbreaks]]

User:ValleyForge

2013-08-21T03:06:03Z

UnthreadedJB: Created page with "#helo. -- Unthreaded."

#helo. -- Unthreaded.

User:UnthreadedJB

2013-08-21T02:21:57Z

UnthreadedJB:

<nowiki>#</nowiki>r u #fakr.
[[Category:Hackers]]

Unthredera1n

2013-08-21T02:19:46Z

UnthreadedJB:

{{lowercase}}
'''[http://unthreadedjb.com unthredera1n]''' is an [[untethered jailbreak]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices except [[k66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1. It is currently available for Linux (x86_64) and OS X. Not much is currently known about this tool.

== Unthredeh4il ==
[[unthredera1n|unthredeh4il]] is an improved version of [[unthredera1n]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices including [[K66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1 including Apple TV OS versions: 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.3 (all versions), 4.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 5.0, and 5.0.1. This is still an [[untethered jailbreak]].

On Reddit, where [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1j4u02/we_hav_releese_isounthreadedjb_redy_4_dl/cbbapvp planetbeing and saurik discussed the tool], saurik said:

<blockquote>
The program is custom; it is using the Rocky Racoon packet filter kernel exploit, but the evasi0n amfid bypass. I verified this somewhat by glancing at the binary (opens /dev/pf, etc.), but they also say this explicitly in some strings inside of the binary (which might be output when it runs or something) and in a hidden readme file.
From .REAL_USAGE:
<blockquote>Thanks to @Chronic-Dev/@planetbeing/@posixninja for the original rocky-raccon pf kernel exploit. Thanks to @evad3rs for their awesome MobileBackup2 stuff. It worked really well on this.</blockquote>
From jb binary:
<blockquote>WE R NOT #FAKR, UNTHREADEDJB IS REEL tanks 2 @planetbeing n @posixninja n @chronicdev for #explot code in rkcy raccon :) :) :) krnl patchs from #opensn0w ))</blockquote>
</blockquote>

===References===
* [https://github.com/UnthreadedJB/isounthreadedjb Github source code (down now)]
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1kjddw/we_r_relees_ful_src_code_of_unthreaddra1n_clasic/cbplh58 Comments from planetbeing and Saurik]

{{stub|jailbreaking}}
[[Category:Jailbreaks]]

Unthredera1n

2013-08-21T02:18:54Z

UnthreadedJB:

{{lowercase}}
'''[http://unthreadedjb.com unthredera1n]''' is an [[untethered jailbreak]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices except [[k66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1. It is currently available for Linux (x86_64) and OS X. Not much is currently known about this tool.

[[unthredera1n|unthrederh4il]] is an improved version of [[unthredera1n]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices including [[K66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1 including Apple TV OS versions: 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.3 (all versions), 4.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 5.0, and 5.0.1. This is still an [[untethered jailbreak]].

On Reddit, where [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1j4u02/we_hav_releese_isounthreadedjb_redy_4_dl/cbbapvp planetbeing and saurik discussed the tool], saurik said:

<blockquote>
The program is custom; it is using the Rocky Racoon packet filter kernel exploit, but the evasi0n amfid bypass. I verified this somewhat by glancing at the binary (opens /dev/pf, etc.), but they also say this explicitly in some strings inside of the binary (which might be output when it runs or something) and in a hidden readme file.
From .REAL_USAGE:
<blockquote>Thanks to @Chronic-Dev/@planetbeing/@posixninja for the original rocky-raccon pf kernel exploit. Thanks to @evad3rs for their awesome MobileBackup2 stuff. It worked really well on this.</blockquote>
From jb binary:
<blockquote>WE R NOT #FAKR, UNTHREADEDJB IS REEL tanks 2 @planetbeing n @posixninja n @chronicdev for #explot code in rkcy raccon :) :) :) krnl patchs from #opensn0w ))</blockquote>
</blockquote>

===References===
* [https://github.com/UnthreadedJB/isounthreadedjb Github source code (down now)]
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1kjddw/we_r_relees_ful_src_code_of_unthreaddra1n_clasic/cbplh58 Comments from planetbeing and Saurik]

{{stub|jailbreaking}}
[[Category:Jailbreaks]]

User:UnthreadedJB

2013-08-21T02:18:10Z

UnthreadedJB: Created page with "#r u #fakr."

#r u #fakr.

Unthredera1n

2013-08-21T02:16:16Z

UnthreadedJB: #we r not #fakr

'''[http://unthreadedjb.com unthredera1n]''' is an [[untethered jailbreak]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices except [[K66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1. It is currently available for Linux (x86_64) and Mac OS. Not much is currently known about this tool.

unthrederh4il is an improved version of [[unthredera1n]] for [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]], [[iPhone 3GS]] and [[A4]] devices including [[K66ap|Apple TV 2G]] running iOS 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5, 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.1 and 5.1.1 including Apple TV OS versions: 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.3 (all versions), 4.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 5.0, and 5.0.1. This is still an [[untethered jailbreak]].

On Reddit, where [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1j4u02/we_hav_releese_isounthreadedjb_redy_4_dl/cbbapvp planetbeing and saurik discussed the tool], saurik said:

<blockquote>
The program is custom; it is using the Rocky Racoon packet filter kernel exploit, but the evasi0n amfid bypass. I verified this somewhat by glancing at the binary (opens /dev/pf, etc.), but they also say this explicitly in some strings inside of the binary (which might be output when it runs or something) and in a hidden readme file.
From .REAL_USAGE:
<blockquote>Thanks to @Chronic-Dev/@planetbeing/@posixninja for the original rocky-raccon pf kernel exploit. Thanks to @evad3rs for their awesome MobileBackup2 stuff. It worked really well on this.</blockquote>
From jb binary:
<blockquote>WE R NOT #FAKR, UNTHREADEDJB IS REEL tanks 2 @planetbeing n @posixninja n @chronicdev for #explot code in rkcy raccon :) :) :) krnl patchs from #opensn0w ))</blockquote>
</blockquote>

===References===
* [https://github.com/UnthreadedJB/isounthreadedjb Github source code (down now)]
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/1kjddw/we_r_relees_ful_src_code_of_unthreaddra1n_clasic/cbplh58 Comments from planetbeing and Saurik]

{{stub|jailbreaking}}
[[Category:Jailbreaks]]