The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Talk:Filesystem
I think we should delete this redirect. It's not in use, but it's title is somewhat descriptive. As for usage, / is linked to on the home page. --5urd (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Isn't this the page where we planned to put all the filesystem content after we delete all filesystem pages (the project we agreed to but never started)? If yes, we shouldn't delete it. Also, as a descriptive name, I would leave it anyway. --http (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What was it we were going to start? I mean how would it be done? --iAdam1n (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I can't remember where the discussion is, but we agreed to delete all filesystem pages, as most of them are empty anyway. Then create a new page (this one?) and list the entire filesystem structure. A short comment for each folder (also list important files) would fit after the name. We can also mark directory branches that only existed in earlier iOS versions. Only filesystem pages that contain a lot of infos would remain on their own page, but with a useful name (not the "/bla/more/bla/even/more/bla/Name" page, but just "Name"). --http (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am all for this. If you would like, I can start moving say /blah/blah/blah to blah and we can start working on it? Maybe we could not bother with heading etc but just move the pages with useful info like said to it's name without all the forward slashes as I think this would be much better. --iAdam1n (talk) 22:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I can't remember where the discussion is, but we agreed to delete all filesystem pages, as most of them are empty anyway. Then create a new page (this one?) and list the entire filesystem structure. A short comment for each folder (also list important files) would fit after the name. We can also mark directory branches that only existed in earlier iOS versions. Only filesystem pages that contain a lot of infos would remain on their own page, but with a useful name (not the "/bla/more/bla/even/more/bla/Name" page, but just "Name"). --http (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- What was it we were going to start? I mean how would it be done? --iAdam1n (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)